No, the content in pretest is absolutely not relevant. That's why it sucks so much.I understand that the PreTest Surgery qbook is harder than the actual shelf (as pointed out here several times).
But I'm ok with that, as long as the content is relevant. So my question is: Did you all feel that the content of PreTest was on target, or too detailed, not detailed enough???
I like PreTest b/c it provides a high volume of questions, sectioned by topics. This allows you to focus your studying . .. . so for instance, if I feel I'm week on trauma, I can read up about it in the Kaplan notes, then go to PreTest to answer questions in the trauma section. Did anybody take this approach? Thoughts/comments???
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Books for Surgery
Started by PimplePopperMD
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.