- Joined
- Apr 9, 2006
- Messages
- 194
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Psychology Student
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I attended an interview for a clinical Ph.D. program last week and ate lunch with two 3rd years.
Both seemed very unhappy.
One was clinically oriented and was lamenting all the time she spent on research. The other was research oriented and hated her clinical practicum. Both felt that they *had* to get a clinical Ph.D. because it was the "most versatile." I am a nontraditional student and have been out in the world for a bit, so I guess I don't think about the sensitivities of grad students to questions, but I asked the clinically oriented person what she thought about the argument that she did not need a clinical Ph.D at all or what were her thoughts in PsyDs. She freaked. She had moved to a state and a town she hated to study something that she didn't feel was relevant was the jist that I got. It scared the crap out of me.
I am not really in to wasting any more time doing things that I don't want to do. In clinical psych, eventually I would like to treat patients in private practice primarily because I don't like working for others and I would like to volunteer and use my law degree and psych training in domestic violence matters, etc. I would like to teach as an adjunct but not tenure.
I am beginning to think that a PsyD from good school (not professional school) or clinically oriented counseling PhD or hybrid clinical PhD all that are much more on the clinical side would be better idea than a traditional clinical Ph.D. I think that the schools are giving primarily clinically oriented students a message - you do have to do research and it will take up a lot of your time.
I am interested in hearing from those practicing what your thoughts are. I am sure you have addressed this before but still finding it hard to get targeted search results using the search function.
Feel free to PM me also.
Both seemed very unhappy.
One was clinically oriented and was lamenting all the time she spent on research. The other was research oriented and hated her clinical practicum. Both felt that they *had* to get a clinical Ph.D. because it was the "most versatile." I am a nontraditional student and have been out in the world for a bit, so I guess I don't think about the sensitivities of grad students to questions, but I asked the clinically oriented person what she thought about the argument that she did not need a clinical Ph.D at all or what were her thoughts in PsyDs. She freaked. She had moved to a state and a town she hated to study something that she didn't feel was relevant was the jist that I got. It scared the crap out of me.
I am not really in to wasting any more time doing things that I don't want to do. In clinical psych, eventually I would like to treat patients in private practice primarily because I don't like working for others and I would like to volunteer and use my law degree and psych training in domestic violence matters, etc. I would like to teach as an adjunct but not tenure.
I am beginning to think that a PsyD from good school (not professional school) or clinically oriented counseling PhD or hybrid clinical PhD all that are much more on the clinical side would be better idea than a traditional clinical Ph.D. I think that the schools are giving primarily clinically oriented students a message - you do have to do research and it will take up a lot of your time.
I am interested in hearing from those practicing what your thoughts are. I am sure you have addressed this before but still finding it hard to get targeted search results using the search function.
Feel free to PM me also.

), but then I realize I still love what I do....I just wish it was more evenly spread out. At this point in my life (after trying a few different things already), I can't picture myself doing anything else.