- Joined
- Mar 1, 2014
- Messages
- 898
- Reaction score
- 1,574
Rogan recently had on JP again (for like what seems the millionth time) and JP at one point starts to discuss an anecdote about a young woman (minor) who was rushed to transitioning by providers. Gives examples of how occam's razor and base rates were essentially ignored (i.e., the girl was likely on the spectrum with a slew of other fairly typical mental syndromes for a teenage girl) and instead of addressing the likely simplest explanations for her problems, she was told "Maybe it's because you're really a man." Then ended up beginning the transitioning process and now has a whole bunch of resultant problems.
Not trying to get into a sociopolitical debate with this question, but here it is nonetheless: JP gives some quote that all medical providers are required to provide "gender affirming advice" or they could face penalty, and then cites that because of this the clinicians weren't able to act as clinical scientists and get to the actual problem at hand. I spent the some time this weekend scouring my state's relevant code and I have yet to see anything like this codified. Admittedly I have yet to do a deep dive into the APA ethics code to see how this would be addressed there or under which umbrella it might be relevant. Also, I'm not sure if this is a Canadian case (JP is licensed up there and currently at risk of losing it unless he goes through mandatory "re-education"), so maybe it's in their ethics code, but I'm wondering... what exactly does "gender affirming advice" really mean??? At least as it pertains to the practice of clinical psychology. Was Peterson just being melodramatic and/or hyperbolic (as he has a tendency to do)?
Not trying to get into a sociopolitical debate with this question, but here it is nonetheless: JP gives some quote that all medical providers are required to provide "gender affirming advice" or they could face penalty, and then cites that because of this the clinicians weren't able to act as clinical scientists and get to the actual problem at hand. I spent the some time this weekend scouring my state's relevant code and I have yet to see anything like this codified. Admittedly I have yet to do a deep dive into the APA ethics code to see how this would be addressed there or under which umbrella it might be relevant. Also, I'm not sure if this is a Canadian case (JP is licensed up there and currently at risk of losing it unless he goes through mandatory "re-education"), so maybe it's in their ethics code, but I'm wondering... what exactly does "gender affirming advice" really mean??? At least as it pertains to the practice of clinical psychology. Was Peterson just being melodramatic and/or hyperbolic (as he has a tendency to do)?