- Joined
- Mar 30, 2005
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm a first year vet student and was reading about treatments for radial nerve damage on a UPenn vet school website
http://cal.vet.upenn.edu/saortho/chapter_66/66mast.htm
One of the treatments discussed involves trasposition of the brachialis muscle to serve as an extensor of the elbow, since the original extensor muscles of the elbow will not be innervated by the damaged radial nerve. My question is: if the musculocutaneous nerve continues to innervate the biceps brachii (flexor of the elbow) and also innervates the brachialis (now an extensor of the elbow) doesn't innervation of the biceps brachii and brachialis negate each others motions? How can you have one nerve innervate agonist/antagonist muscles? Thanks,
Kim
http://cal.vet.upenn.edu/saortho/chapter_66/66mast.htm
One of the treatments discussed involves trasposition of the brachialis muscle to serve as an extensor of the elbow, since the original extensor muscles of the elbow will not be innervated by the damaged radial nerve. My question is: if the musculocutaneous nerve continues to innervate the biceps brachii (flexor of the elbow) and also innervates the brachialis (now an extensor of the elbow) doesn't innervation of the biceps brachii and brachialis negate each others motions? How can you have one nerve innervate agonist/antagonist muscles? Thanks,
Kim