xkitto
New Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2025
- Messages
- 4
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 1
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hi all,
Posting on behalf of my friend applying this cycle. They are a ~518, 3.9 applicant from CA (ORM).
4 IIs (3 from T20s) total, all waitlists except CalNorthstate. Multiple councilors and a supervisor on alma mater's admissions committee have reviewed the app and stated the writing and ECs were strong, with a good narrative. I've also read the app and agree. Excellent LORs.
We're in a tricky situation debating reapplying in June vs. taking the CalNorthstate acceptance, assuming worst case they don't get off waitlists. I've read all the accreditation and administrative issues. Another issue is they'd need to take out private loans fully. They're also interested in continuing research with early interest in ophtho which CalNorthstate has limited support of. On the other hand, worried about "reapplicant bias" and whether to just take the MD and move on. Though I think their app is strong, and bad luck / late submission might be the main factor, there is a chance next cycle nets no acceptances at all. Any advisors able to weigh in on reapplication risks, or current CNUSOM students able to discuss their experience?
Very general summary:
Non-clinical volunteering w/ leadership (2000+)
Research (2000+) with posters and textbook chapter (no formal pubs but multiple under review).
Clinical Volunteering (600, though categorized this under "Leadership". MME did make it clear this was volunteering to the medically underserved. Perhaps this is on the lower end / should have categorized explicitly as clinical volunteering. Weakest part of the app imo)
Shadowing (200)
Other humanities & arts related activities.
Secondaries complete late (Most were after labor day ~September). Applied to 45 schools-- the CA schools + some T20s + mix of 20 schools "ranked" lower that don't have heavy IS bias against CA. Secondaries were not "copy + paste". They researched each school and really tried to tailor to mission and the geographical history of the school as their ECs allowed.
I'm at a loss... both humbled and frustrated by the application process. I truly do not see red flags in the app, as I went through the application process myself a few years ago, and believe it's competitive + bad luck + late submission.
Posting on behalf of my friend applying this cycle. They are a ~518, 3.9 applicant from CA (ORM).
4 IIs (3 from T20s) total, all waitlists except CalNorthstate. Multiple councilors and a supervisor on alma mater's admissions committee have reviewed the app and stated the writing and ECs were strong, with a good narrative. I've also read the app and agree. Excellent LORs.
We're in a tricky situation debating reapplying in June vs. taking the CalNorthstate acceptance, assuming worst case they don't get off waitlists. I've read all the accreditation and administrative issues. Another issue is they'd need to take out private loans fully. They're also interested in continuing research with early interest in ophtho which CalNorthstate has limited support of. On the other hand, worried about "reapplicant bias" and whether to just take the MD and move on. Though I think their app is strong, and bad luck / late submission might be the main factor, there is a chance next cycle nets no acceptances at all. Any advisors able to weigh in on reapplication risks, or current CNUSOM students able to discuss their experience?
Very general summary:
Non-clinical volunteering w/ leadership (2000+)
Research (2000+) with posters and textbook chapter (no formal pubs but multiple under review).
Clinical Volunteering (600, though categorized this under "Leadership". MME did make it clear this was volunteering to the medically underserved. Perhaps this is on the lower end / should have categorized explicitly as clinical volunteering. Weakest part of the app imo)
Shadowing (200)
Other humanities & arts related activities.
Secondaries complete late (Most were after labor day ~September). Applied to 45 schools-- the CA schools + some T20s + mix of 20 schools "ranked" lower that don't have heavy IS bias against CA. Secondaries were not "copy + paste". They researched each school and really tried to tailor to mission and the geographical history of the school as their ECs allowed.
I'm at a loss... both humbled and frustrated by the application process. I truly do not see red flags in the app, as I went through the application process myself a few years ago, and believe it's competitive + bad luck + late submission.

