- Joined
- Jul 24, 2010
- Messages
- 2,624
- Reaction score
- 740
Imma break down calculus for you.
Newton was a smart guy. He realized that you can use the old rise/run formula from algebra to find the slope of a function. He was tricky because he realized that using really small run values will allow you to find the slope at every point in the function. The rise/run formula, using really small run values at lots of different points in the function, becomes the new derivative formula. This derivative function will give you the slope at any point for a given starting function.
Similarly, Newton realized that you can construct a bunch of little squares under a curve to find the area under that curve. If you make the squares really small and over a range of values, you get an integral function.
Derivatives are useful for figuring out the behavior of an object, such as the classic projectile problems in physics--you can find out whether it's speeding up or slowing down. Integrals are useful because you can figure out how far the ball went over time.
You spend most of calculus 1 figuring out how Newton arrived at the simple method of differentiating functions and why differentiating works. The latter part of calc 1 is usually practicing and applying differentiation; you may start on integrating, which is the opposite of differentiating. Calc 2 focuses half on integrals and half on proving weird stuff related to series approximations, which don't make any sense until you apply them in engineering classes way down the road (I hated calc 2, ftr). Calc 3 uses more than one variable, diff EQ uses more than one derivative.
See? Calculus and calc-based physics are not that hard. Most math teachers just use difficult, obfuscating terminology to make it hard to digest. The good math teachers are the ones who explain things in simple words and more conceptually/applicably than just theoretically.
Were you a math or physics major? Saw your username and post and was just wondering.