- Joined
- Nov 1, 2003
- Messages
- 2,336
- Reaction score
- 6
After reading in countless posts how tough Californians have it compared to applicants from other states, I got curious: is this true? I believe the attached file, an excel reformat of 2003 AAMC data, shows that it is most definitely not.
In fact, California is at about the middle of the list with 51.8% rejects. DC, CO, WA, AK and NM are the worst at 64.5%, 62.6%, 60.9% and 59.7% respectively getting in NOWHERE. Of these, CO and WA have enough applicants to make the data significant.
But wait, you say! How about in-state matriculation? Surely California applicants have a poorer shot in-state than anyone else? Nope. California is tenth among states that have med schools, again following CO and WA with their relatively large number of applicants.
Anyway, I know we *all* have it tough. Applicants from my state, Virginia, are rejected 53% of the time. Wish me luck!
In fact, California is at about the middle of the list with 51.8% rejects. DC, CO, WA, AK and NM are the worst at 64.5%, 62.6%, 60.9% and 59.7% respectively getting in NOWHERE. Of these, CO and WA have enough applicants to make the data significant.
But wait, you say! How about in-state matriculation? Surely California applicants have a poorer shot in-state than anyone else? Nope. California is tenth among states that have med schools, again following CO and WA with their relatively large number of applicants.
Anyway, I know we *all* have it tough. Applicants from my state, Virginia, are rejected 53% of the time. Wish me luck!