Can I prescribe myself stuff?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Has anyone in this thread stated that emergency prescribing was wrong? :confused:

So, that is your definition of emergency prescribing? ok, then. cool. I guess I wouldn't have necessarily considered an impending UTI an emergency, but I don't know.

Anyway, self-prescribing, etc is fine within reason... I mean, come on, aren't we allowed SOME professional courtesy for all that we've been through?

Members don't see this ad.
 
As a PD, I have this discussion with my new interns at orientation. Laws vary by state, most allow self and family prescribing, but I highly suggest my residents avoid doing it. Personally, I am willing to refill a standing medication at the same dose (MDI, thyroid, OCP's) for a family member for one month/no refills in a pinch, but I suggest residents never prescribe for themselves and avoid starting new meds for their friends and family. Why?

1. Many residents train under a training license, not a full license (varies by state). Your training license is clearly not valid for prescribing for friends and family members. Would anyone ever prosecute you for practicing without a license for this type of thing? No, but still it's a bad idea.

2. If you prescribe and don't document in the chart, that can cause big problems in the future. If you do document, you may be violating HIPAA regulations. Could that cause any problems? Yes! One of my residents prescribed for his wife, and then ended up getting divorced. His ex lodged a complaint with the hosp that he had illegaly accessed her record. They agreed and (almost) terminated him. Is this likely to happen to you? No, but it could.

3. If you prescribe amox for a friend, and then they anaphylax and die, how will you feel about that? What if a PCN allergy is documented in their chart, but they didn't mention it to you?

Bottom line for me is this: You can prescribe for yourself and your family/friends, and nothing bad will happen 99+% of the time. Thus, many people do it and it seems like no big deal. Rarely however, something very bad can happen, and I think it's best that people avoid this practice to avoid those rare bad events. Some will argue that the bad outcomes are rare enough that it's not a problem. Both arguments are "right", perhaps until you're the person with the bad outcome.

Previous posters have mentioned that reasons for self prescribing can be: needing an actual appointment for alb refills / check a TSH / review a lab result, docs being unwilling to treat UTI's and other basic problems over the phone, long waits in the ED, no defined or available PCP, etc. These are all major problems with our health care system, and honestly are unacceptable. Self prescribing is an expedient way to address them, but is really a poor fitting bandaid on the problem. As a physician (or resident, student, etc), I would think that it would be relatively easy to get these types of things called in -- I, for example, would call in any basic medication for any of the residents in my practice if asked. Perhaps I am naive.

Given the perceived need to self prescribe by some, the interesting question to ask is this:

If you are having so much trouble as a physician getting the basic care you need, such that you feel the need to care for yourself, how are our patients doing who can't prescribe for themselves?
 
Given the perceived need to self prescribe by some, the interesting question to ask is this:

If you are having so much trouble as a physician getting the basic care you need, such that you feel the need to care for yourself, how are our patients doing who can't prescribe for themselves?

Wow. Excellent post. Thanks for that.
 
your easiest route to albuterol inhalers is befriending the resp therapist guys and gals, especially those in the ICU. they can make an MDI appear out of thin air. i'm sure that is another ethical dilemma, but at least i could breathe after coding the patient ;-)
 
As a physician (or resident, student, etc), I would think that it would be relatively easy to get these types of things called in -- I, for example, would call in any basic medication for any of the residents in my practice if asked. Perhaps I am naive.

I tend to think that many residents wouldn't want to discuss their urinary tract or yeast infections with their program director and would rather just write the medication for themselves if they had to. Wouldn't want you to have TMI.
 
How about Viagra? I'm still young and somewhat usefull, but I could see myself needing this to make some kids in the future. It would be alittle embarassing to have to go to another resident/colleage.
 
One guy was seriously reprimanded and nearly fired from residency for self-prescribing a non-narcotic med.​

But just have to say, that Albuterol is still an Rx med is such a crock of crap!!! and "Bronkaid" is OTC!- far more dangerous, abused, less effective, and used as a recreational drug. WTF??​

You can go to Mexico and buy tons of Ventolin without any Rx, and they're probably not silly enough to stick Bronkaid on their shelves.​

Without going into the obvious ethical matters, in some states, licensed physicians can self-prescribe. For instance, I've heard in DC of physicians walking up to the Rx counter and writing their own script. Other states like CA, no way.​
 
My albuterol is running out and I was wondering if I could get myself some more w/o having to talk to my PMD.

Can you? Yes, you'll probably will get away with it or have another resident do it for you.

Should you? No.
A) You can avoid all the drama by getting one inhaler from the pharmacy as long as you can show you've had one before. B) You deserve a Primary Care Provider. If you don't think you deserve a PCP, why do you think anyone does? C) If you signed something when you joined the residency stating you will NOT prescribe for yourself, family, or for peers outside of a clinic relationship, then you do it anyway 'cause it's more convenient, that tells us what kind of person you are and will be as a physician. Some of the posters here seem to think, "The rules, laws, ethics I swore to uphold? Sure, good idea unless I don't feel like it." If you didn't mean you would follow the rules, why did you sign them? If you decide later they are stupid and you won't be following them, then have the courage to write to your Program Director stating your intent to ignore what you signed. If your free time is more important than the quality of the medical care your family receives, and if "common sense" is more important than the standards you swore and signed to uphold, then I know exactly how you are going to treat your patients when the going gets tough.

I'm astounded (though, I suppose, not surprised) to see the "situational ethics" of many posters.
 
How about you get astounded by how many hrs an intern and resident works during a "business week" and on weekends...when most doctors have their primary care appointments available...

For chrissakes, it's not HIV medications, it's just an inhaler.
 
Mea Culpa! Yup, I confess I am a sinner, because I have (and do) Rx myself, and family too. However, I can agree with solid arguments made by aProgDirector, esp. during Residency. Also, I do have a rule that I don't Rx for friends.

However, even though I have a couple of quasi-random letters after my name, I think I'm still allowed to use some common sense. So obviously, I don't prescribe meds for myself or family that requires tests, monitoring, or that I'm not familiar with.

However, I do remember a plan hatched by friends during med school about a "special" new year's party after getting "licensed to prescribe". (just to state the obvious, it was all a laugh, and at the time I was such a boring Gunner that even the thought made me cringe. Oh well. Happy med school memories - fading so fast.)
 
It is definitly not a good idea to have prescription pads with both your name and DEA # on it. Those sell for $$$ on the street.
 
so what's the self-prescription/prescription for friends/family policy for california as 1) interns w/o dea number 2) as PGY2 w/ license/dea 3) as fellows w/ license/dea/abim?

Is there a specific link for california? I keep hearing 'laws vary by states', but nothing specific.

I don't think i'd prescribe anything for friends/fam w/ dea number, but common stuff like antibiotics, acne meds (not accutane), allergy meds, etc.
 
so what's the self-prescription/prescription for friends/family policy for california as 1) interns w/o dea number 2) as PGY2 w/ license/dea 3) as fellows w/ license/dea/abim?

Is there a specific link for california? I keep hearing 'laws vary by states', but nothing specific.

I don't think i'd prescribe anything for friends/fam w/ dea number, but common stuff like antibiotics, acne meds (not accutane), allergy meds, etc.

Well....2007 is a CRAZY year!!! I'll try to make it as simple as possible, but this is the year many changes take place, so hold on.

Its easiest, I think to separate out prescribing from reimbursement.

For prescribing in CA - you need a CA license & prescribe within the scope of your practice (lets not go there again.....for medicine - the scope is broader than dentistry, podiatry, etc... - you get the idea). This covers your antibiox, nasal sprays, inhalers, etc...

For prescribing controlled drugs - you need your OWN DEA #. You can't use the senior resident's #, your PD, your hospital...you must have your own & you must use "secure" rx blanks from CA approved printers. If you don't have your own blanks, you can call in controlled drugs - WITH the exception of CII's - those cannot be called in, unless the pt is in hospice or we have a huge national emergency os some such....

As a pharmacist, I don't care if you're an intern, PGY4, fellowship or run the whole department - you just need a CA license to prescribe (& DEA if controlled...:p ).

I think that covers the prescribing part.

NOW - the reimbursement part - this part is HORRIBLE, but only for 1 year.

If you want your loved one's rx to be covered by insurance, no matter what the rx is for - even spectazole cream for your husband's awful athelete's foot - to be covered by insurance, the insurance company needs to be able to "see" the prescriber. Before May 23 (in CA), the only way they can "see" you is by a DEA# (because this is unique to you & you alone....the numbers are not reused, even if you die).

But - AFTER May 23, you must have an NPI (National Provider Identifier) # (see www.cms.hhs.gov to get one). This number will be used for provider identification for ALL rxs - from Clarinex to Oxycontin. But....if you prescribe Oxycontin (we're assuming not for your family:p ), you will also need a DEA # too. The NPI# will now be the unique provider # & last your whole lifetime & we will protect the DEA#'s a bit more closely.

We have other unique provider #s as well - accutane & thalomide provider #s, but we won't go there.

So, to summarize:

BEFORE May 23 - you need a CA license # to prescribe noncontrolled. To be reimbursed by insurance, you need a CA license & DEA #.

AFTER May 23 - you need a CA license # to prescribed noncontrolled. To be reimbursed by insurance, you need a CA license & NPI#.

Ask again if this is still confusing....:)

Welcome to CA!!!:D
 
What about if you move(or are in another state) but have your old state license(say...in California). Can you write for basic meds in another state as long as you have your DEA and NPI?
 
What about if you move(or are in another state) but have your old state license(say...in California). Can you write for basic meds in another state as long as you have your DEA and NPI?

Yeah....after I wrote this, I thought about all the rxs I fill for people who see physicians in other states - I'm in an area where people go to MD Anderson, Mayo Clinic, etc....lots & lots of other places...

You need a valid state license to practice (any state will do for CA - but this is where it gets tricky. Not all states recognize other state licenses. For example, a pharmacy in TX won't honor a controlled rx written by a CA MD/DO - go figure) - be careful here - don't be an "internet" prescriber - I think we covered this pages ago.... But, any state license works in CA for noncontrolled substances.

For reimbursement, before May 23, I need a DEA. After May 23, I need an NPI.

For all controlled I need a DEA - but don't go there with your family if you can help it in anyway!

I'm planning on taking vacation the last week of May - any idea why???:D
 
I was just curious, can doctors prescribe every medication available? Would it look strange if a FM or derm was prescribing some cancer medication?
 
I was just curious, can doctors prescribe every medication available? Would it look strange if a FM or derm was prescribing some cancer medication?

The first and easy answer is no, they cannot - it has to be within their scope of practice. But...there are always exceptions (listen...pharmacy practice laws have more exceptions to the rules than rules themselves:p - no not really. But...you get the idea.;) )

However, your example of a FM or derm prescribing a cancer medication is not at all unreasonable. 5-FU is commonly prescribed for skin cancers, so those would not raise any eyebrows, whether a FM or derm prescribed it.

Now...an intrathecal antineoplastic...perhaps...I actually had a derm prescribe a vaginal antifungal - antifungal is well within the scope...vaginal, perhaps not so much...but this pt had an extremely resistant yeast infection & was referred by her gyn to a derm. It was all OK with me. The only reason I knew so much about the detail was because the strength of the antifungal required a prior auth & I had to contact the prescriber, not because I questioned the route.

I think this was dealt with a few pages back......the bottom line..you stay within what your scope of practice is - no one is going to care. You get into the most trouble when you go outside that, especially with federal controlled drug laws.
 
I agree.
- Does a plumber hire another plumber to fix his pipes?
- Does an accountant refuse to do his own taxes?
- Does a lawyer have to hire another attorney to analyse his contracts?
- Does a dentist hire another dentist to fix the teeth of his own family?

I think its funny how Puritan we still are in medicine..you would think we walk around with shoe buckles and turkey rifles for all the events of the last two centuries. The idea of denying care to your own family members seems unnatural, cold, and defies common sense.

I'm not a huge fan of the limits of prescribing for small things or chronic stable issues, but my parents need to see a separate objective primary care doc.

There are certain questions that I feel strange asking my family but I know have to be asked and I prefer someone more objective do them. As such, I guess I am technically denying care to my own family. At the same time, I will never accidentally ascribe a loved one's urinary hesitance to BPH and miss a malignancy because I was too lazy to send them to a PMD.

but i'm completely okay with self treating stuff that is overwhelmingly benign. just don't be a **** and slide down the slippery slope. :)
 
What a bizarre thread. I suspect there are some strange misconceptions about how pharmacies take and process prescriptions that are phoned in.

"Hello this is [whomever] calling in a prescription for [person's name] date of birth [MM/DD/YY] The script is for [Bactrim DS 1 po bid x 10 days] If you have any question, the office number is [whatever (+ extension if necessary)]

Pharmacists aren't nazis. There's no magic. You don't need to justify who you're calling what in for, or why. Trust me, the pharmacy personnel don't give a sh-t. (Unless it's something covered by Medicare Part B, but that's outside the scope of this thread.) Honestly, unless you sound shady on the message, no one's going to bother you. You could even call in a script for yourself and use a fellow resident's name, and we won't follow up on it so long as you're both men or both women. (Oh nose, did I just say that??)

I've bent countless rules for all sorts of people in all sorts of situations ranging from prophylactic Amoxicillin, to young 20-somethings freaking out because they're out of the OCP that they've been getting for eons, to albuterol inhalers for someone whose having an asthma attack and is out of refills.

There's no magic involved. It's called doing the right thing, and IMO, it trumps whatever the law says.

As far as insurance companies not covering for certain DEA #s... well. This does happen. But I've never let it thwart me, as I'll just call and ask who the attending is, and would you all mind if I changed the name on the prescriptions. (Or I'll just do it, because I couldn't be arsed to waste my time when I know the answer is going to be an unquivocal "yes".)

Hi, newly minted intern here. So what exactly does one have to do to call in a prescription? How do they know I'm a doc and not just some schmoe trying to get their flonase fix?
We don't. Not a clue, actually. You could be a patient and phone in a prescription, and if you sound like you know WTF you're talking about, and there are no red flags, it's probably going to be filled with no questions asked.

We know.....& no...I won't give away how I get the ways to know - just know that I can & I do when its important enough (albuterol is not important enough!)
Technically true, but not really. I could call in a prescription pretending I was calling from my doc's office to a pharmacy (not my own, obviously), and no one would be the wiser. Again, so long as there are no red flags. ALH not being a med worth caring about in this context.

Just learned that recently. Thought it was interesting. All the frowning on self- and fam-prescribing is largely cultural. To my surprise, I'm finding that MUCH of medicine is nothing more than taboo, superstition and cultural norms given unnatural staying power by highly controlling personalities.
I try not to let the red tape interfere with my common sense and good judgment.

But did you also know that I am double boarded? My license says on it, Physician and Surgeon. I, and hospital credentialling boards, not you determine my scope of practice. And just how do you know who is, and who is not my relative? HIPPAA won't allow me to share their complete social history with you without their permission. Some of my relatives and friends come to me for care because they know me and trust me to give them the best possible treatment.
Generally speaking, if you're an MD or DO, no questions will be raised at all. At least everywhere I've been. Unless we happen to know that you're a pediatrician who exclusively treats children, who writes a one-off script for someone old enough to be a grandmother. (Has happened.) In that particular case, the prescription wasn't for anything crazy, so it was filled anyway. We question dentists and such more than anything else.

Actually, just yesterday I had a situation where a dentist wrote for Zovirax cream, apply as needed. That was a bit strange -- it didn't even occur to me that it could be for external fever blisters. (Duh!) Felt like a jackass after questioning that one. I've never seen it before, though. Hope to not see it again as the pharmacy is getting boring and I hope to be out soon.

Generally speaking, common sense and good judgment applies.

I have a license# and an office address, no reason to use the DEA.
I work for a chain. I can pretty much look up anyone's DEA #, rarely do I have to call and find it out. But if I have to, I will. And I won't fill the script until I get it. Generally when a script is called in, the DEA# is not given, unless it's the doctor him/herself calling it in. And then it's painfully obvious that they aren't used to calling in their own scripts. It's kind of comical, really. :)

It's a matter of being thorough more than wanting to be a nazi. I don't like making phonecalls. I don't have the time to do it, but I'm trying to save my other pharmacy personnel in the same chain the trouble of calling, which theoretically means that once I have it, no one from my chain will ever need to call the office again.

Sometimes it can take a few days to propagate chain-wide.

and "Bronkaid" is OTC!- far more dangerous, abused, less effective, and used as a recreational drug. WTF??
Bronkaid's a weird one. It cannot be rung out at my particular chain by scanning the UPC. We have to do it as a generic "Non-tax" item. It's got regular ephedra in it... why it's still on the market is beyond me. (Not that I give a d-mn either way.) I do think it's weird that we can order it but we're not supposed to sell it. (WTF.)

It is definitly not a good idea to have prescription pads with both your name and DEA # on it. Those sell for $$$ on the street.
Ugh tell me about it. Most PharmAlerts are for stolen pads. :rolleyes: Though most prescriptions generated by an EMR could be easily replicated by someone with a copy of MS Word and a spare hour or two.

We had a case of someone selling customized OxyContin prescriptions around this area, complete with accurate names and dates of birth. Probably taking clients' information, and selling them these bogus scripts at a couple hundred bucks a whack.

PS- This NPI number crap can suck my balls.
 
NPI - this number takes effect May 23 - our pharmacy just got ours today ....ah 7 week before??? Plueaseee! I'm waiting for the backlog on May 23...

Last week, I got four - count them four rxs - for a dr shopping pt. I was able to stall the pt long enough - overnight to fax (I hate phone calling too!) the info to the staff. After long conversations (ultimately on the phone - ugh!) this particular MD was the last in a string of 5 in the last 2 weeks. The guy had just gotten 100 vicoprofen 3 days before & was looking for more. The other 3 I totally blew off - they were obviously fake - poorly written, not my pt, non-standard rx lingo......someone else filled them, but its not my problem! Where are your pads that are so easy to get? Honestly, in CA - these are checkable - do you just leave them about??

Fortunately, I think the one pt is off my radar - he know's I'll call, so he won't be my problem.

I did have a call from the DEA though - one of our dentist "mills" - those who have a dentist of the day type of practice, was allowing each dentist to write on her rxs - not valid in CA. I refused 3 - she called to complain - threatened to report me to the DEA. I said sure - gave her the phone #. I got a call from my local DEA agent - this man said thanks & this dentist just earned herself a visit from the DEA - not something you want for sure. Now - I get the rxs phoned in, which is completely valid. So - this dentist is too cheap to buy rx pads for each of her daily subs???? Again - pleeeeze - rx pads are nothing compared to the equipment they buy (this I know after having agreed to spend $100K on a new piece of dental equipment!).

Now...what have I done for mds this week? Hmmm....nice retired psychiatrist with a replacement mitral valve & seeing his dentist tomorrow - I let him write an rx for himself for amox (I also gave him the most recent prophylactic recs from Chest) - good with me! Another nice retired ophthalmolgist I used to work with inpt is coming down for his grandaughter's hs graduation & needs his medications. His license has lapsed, so insurance won't pay. He tells me about his friend - I get new rxs written by the friend - he gets his meds & he'll be on the hs football field Friday night with his grandaughter.

Now...the dentist who about a year ago wanted to write for Differin Cr for his son, which, btw...was denied a year ago by the derm for lack of an appt & now he wants to write the rx. No, after finding out the kid hadn't seen the derm in over a year, no - no Differin for the dentist's kid (my husband is a dentist - he can afford a derm appt - this guys just lazy or cheap...don't know which!!!).

But...we are getting close to July. I just spoke with my colleague at Stanford who agrees...we are just getting the rxs nice & tidy & are expecting an influx of "unclear" ones starting July 2. We have about 6 weeks until the crazy stuff happens.

I don't do OCP's without refills - thats how the MD/Do gets them back - this buys them a wait at the Planned Parenthood behind me. If you're old enough to need them, you're old enough to be responsible! For the residents who are planning to move across the country - now is the time to call your gyn or have your wife call hers - get a new rx!!!! (or make sure there are enough refills on the one on file so we can transfer it. You won't have time in July to get an appt nor to go. This goes for albuterol & your Propecia, Allegra, Zyrtec, Nasonex, Flonase & any other chronic meds you use. Appts for gyns in my area take about 3 months to get.)

If not, I'll sell you Plan B, otc Claritin or generic Afrin - not the best choices!
 
I am only pre med right now (so I have no first hand info on this), but this sounds like some jack a$$ pharmacist getting his/her **** off by busting the chops of a resident. A FULLY LICENSED physician is just that.

Sometimes, not always.

The audits I am aware of are when the insurance company audits the pharmacy. If every "i" isn't dotted and each "T" crossed, the pharmacy has to pay some pretty steep fines PER Rx. They also risk losing a contract with that insurance company.

If it is a cash pay, non narc, it shouldn't be a problem. If insurance is paying the tab, it has to be done right. You can't really expect the pharmacy to pay a fine because you don't feel it is important enough to worry about. That's just not right. Amazingly, they won't consider you special enough to risk the fines/contracts.
 
Sometimes, not always.

The audits I am aware of are when the insurance company audits the pharmacy. If every "i" isn't dotted and each "T" crossed, the pharmacy has to pay some pretty steep fines PER Rx. They also risk losing a contract with that insurance company.

If it is a cash pay, non narc, it shouldn't be a problem. If insurance is paying the tab, it has to be done right. You can't really expect the pharmacy to pay a fine because you don't feel it is important enough to worry about. That's just not right. Amazingly, they won't consider you special enough to risk the fines/contracts.

I guess I missed this post by Hardbody...but, I don't really want to go back to quote him/her.

The way a pharmacy insurance audit works is like this - you get a list of anywhere from 100-200 claims (never less than 100 claims) which have occured over the course of one calendar year.

You must document the hard copy of prescription (it it was a verbal, then the hard copy we wrote from the verbal with all incumbent documentation).

Likewise, you have to document the signature log (can be a physical signature log or an electronice signature capture log). This process for 100 rxs will take the bulk of one day to find the detail they want.

If the insurance company finds a discrepancy in any one of the the rxs it audits, it has the authority & the abiity to not only charge back any monies paid on that one claim, it has the abilty to charge back any monies it has paid to that one particular pharmacy for the WHOLE calendar year covered (on ALL claims paid). Not fair you say - no one cares that its not fair...thats the way it is!

The insurance company holds ALL the cards here. We absolutely must cross our t's & dot our i's.

Now....if they have a real issue....they can go to the prescriber's records. I know this because my husband is a prescriber. If they are looking for fraud from a particular patient, pharmacy or prescriber...they will go to the prescriber's records & go thru his/her charts - its a pain in the a** for all parties involved.

If it is the federal government (Medicaid) it happens. In fact, I just got the most recent Medicaid statement of providers who have lost their billing privileges for Medicaid - its common knowledge & easily found. Do you think Aetna, Cigna, BC or BS don't know this as well????

The bottom line here is - if someone else is paying the bill - you can't scam them - they'll find out. I have no reason to want to help you save a few bucks because you're trying to scam your insurance.

Controlled drugs are a whole different story - I won't risk anything for getting you some Vicodin.
 
I am thinking it would be tough to legally refuse a prescription based on the pharmacists percieved "scope of practice".

This is mainly because that a MD has a full liscense, unrestricted, and it is valid for both Medicine and Surgery.

So, an IM doc can 100% legally prescribe his patients Neuro, antineoplastic, antipsychotics or any other thing they wish to prescribe their patients.

Same for any other, a Surgeon can legally prescribe OCP etc.

The only place I have ever seen "out of scope of practice" used was for candy docs that got caught prescribing to people that were not their patients, hence not in their scope of practice.

As a matter of fact, in most states it is 100% LEGAL to perform neurosurgery with only a completed intern year in any specialty, including psych. Getting insurance, defending malpractice claims, and hospital priviliges are a different story, but LEGALLY one only needs a valid medical liscense, which in most states is available after one year of internship in any specialty.

So, legally there is no "scope of practice" for a fully liscensed physician, other than whether or not the patient really is their legitimate patient.

Morally is a different story, not saying that. Just saying that legally if you are a liscensed physician you can prescribe anything you feel comfortable with provided that the patient is actually one of your patients.
 
I am thinking it would be tough to legally refuse a prescription based on the pharmacists percieved "scope of practice".

This is mainly because that a MD has a full liscense, unrestricted, and it is valid for both Medicine and Surgery.

So, an IM doc can 100% legally prescribe his patients Neuro, antineoplastic, antipsychotics or any other thing they wish to prescribe their patients.

Same for any other, a Surgeon can legally prescribe OCP etc.

The only place I have ever seen "out of scope of practice" used was for candy docs that got caught prescribing to people that were not their patients, hence not in their scope of practice.

As a matter of fact, in most states it is 100% LEGAL to perform neurosurgery with only a completed intern year in any specialty, including psych. Getting insurance, defending malpractice claims, and hospital priviliges are a different story, but LEGALLY one only needs a valid medical liscense, which in most states is available after one year of internship in any specialty.

So, legally there is no "scope of practice" for a fully liscensed physician, other than whether or not the patient really is their legitimate patient.

Morally is a different story, not saying that. Just saying that legally if you are a liscensed physician you can prescribe anything you feel comfortable with provided that the patient is actually one of your patients.

agreed... I mean, even though I might not go into derm, I'll do whatever CME and personal research I need to keep abreast of, say, acne, and would prescribe Differin to friends of mine if I feel it's appropriate (with full charting and so on). If not, time to find a different pharmacist?

How does insurance pay for self-precriptions? Are thee any special procedures and protocols that doctors have to follow, with respect to getting full coverage for that z-pack? What about if it's one of those prior authorization drugs... with an MD, one could technically authorize oneself for a "medically necessary" drug.
 
If a doc in State A writes a rx for a patient in his office (in State A), but the patient then travels to State B and goes to the pharmacy in State B, is that prescription valid and will the pharmacy fill it?

This is assuming that the doc has a valid license in State A, but does not have a license in State B.

Like, for example, Vancouver Washington. People who live in Vancouver Washington are always going across the bridge to Portland Oregon. They buy their gas there, do their food shopping there, go to conventions there, etc.
 
Like, for example, Vancouver Washington. People who live in Vancouver Washington are always going across the bridge to Portland Oregon. They buy their gas there, do their food shopping there, go to conventions there, etc.

Nice. Way to swoop in, irrelevantly bump a 5 year old thread and then, pull it out by repping my hometown.
 
Top