- Joined
- Jun 26, 2012
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 4
I'm a soon-to-be college freshman and I signed up for a writing class that meets once a week for 3 hours straight. Is this bearable, or should I try to switch out?
I'm a soon-to-be college freshman and I signed up for a writing class that meets once a week for 3 hours straight. Is this bearable, or should I try to switch out?
I'm a soon-to-be college freshman and I signed up for a writing class that meets once a week for 3 hours straight. Is this bearable, or should I try to switch out?
I'm a soon-to-be college freshman and I signed up for a writing class that meets once a week for 3 hours straight. Is this bearable, or should I try to switch out?
OK, first I HAVE to ask, what happened to the other two H's in acetic acid?
I think that the big problem with classes that meet for 3 hours straight once a week as opposed to 90 minutes twice a week is that they skimp on instruction. You end up getting out early and taking breaks. People taking it twice a week get more of what you payed for.
Plus, I could do just about anything unpleasant for only 90 minutes.
I'm a soon-to-be college freshman and I signed up for a writing class that meets once a week for 3 hours straight. Is this bearable, or should I try to switch out?
I was "afraid" of night classes for awhile in college, I think I thought I would forget to go to them or I would end up being really bored. It turned out I had to take a few in my major because they were trying to cater to the commuter/night students and would only make certain classes available as night classes. Never turned back. I loved night classes and if I had known that earlier I would have taken more as a freshman/sophomore. It was so nice to get class out of the way in one go (I felt like I had so much more free time even though objectively it was the same - just because my schedule was more consolidated) and like others I felt like we were able to get more done. I also felt like I got to know my classmates more in those classes - it wasn't as much of just an "in and out" like with regular classes since you are forced to spend so much time together at once. I did end up with one that was pretty boring but honestly I think I sat in the back and brought a book to read (it was a lecture). LOL Our professors always gave breaks in the middle and sometimes we would have people bring dinner for the whole class, especially on presentation or test days.
I usually don't stand them but sit......*crickets*
Oddly enough "sitting for a test" isn't really a common expression I'm the US. You only ever really hear people from other places say that '*random observation*
😕
To sit means to put something in one place; to situate
It's a pretty common phrase elsewhere in the world, and crops up occasionally in the US...they "sit for an exam" rather than "take a test". To be fair, neither take nor sit is being used in its normal form, so there's not really a 'more correct' colloquialism!
I think it really depends on the class. A lot of people here are saying that a 3 hour class isn't so bad, but my experience was different. In my last year of college I took a three hour, once a week graduate neuro course. I, along with everyone else it seemed, went into the class thinking "this won't be so bad". Fast-forward a couple months and even the professor was barely able to stand it anymore. During break he actually apologized to us saying he was never going to do a three hour class again. Meanwhile no one in the class had the mental stamina to keep taking notes after the first two hours, and many didn't even last that long. I think what made it so bad was that it was 3-4 solid hours (he liked to run over by 30-60min) of extremely dense comparative functional neuroanatomy. It was the kind of class that really shouldn't have run longer than 50 min.
However, I imagine that if you're taking a three hour philosophy group discussion class then it's a lot easier.