You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
carbon monoxide
Started by cage92
Seminoma answered your question, but here is the link to the other thread for your reference: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...t-shift-in-oxygen-dissociation-curve.1101017/
Just remember that clinically, your patient will have an apparent SpO2 that is substantially higher, as CO makes hemoglobin appear saturated.
I believe that has more to do with the calculation of SaO2 by a standard pulse oximeter because they do not take into account other forms of hemoglobin (methemoglobin and carboxyhemoglobin). Despite the presence of methemoglobinemia or carboxyhemoglobin, the standard pulse oximeter would give a falsely high reading. If you measure SaO2 with a co-oximeter, the greater number of wavelengths emitted gives you the ability to detect the other hemoglobins for a more accurate reading (in the case of metHb or carboxyHb: decreased SaO2).
This is exactly what I was saying, I just didn't care to explain. It's a very serious thing to keep in mind if you end up with certain cases.I believe that has more to do with the calculation of SaO2 by a standard pulse oximeter because they do not take into account other forms of hemoglobin (methemoglobin and carboxyhemoglobin). Despite the presence of methemoglobinemia or carboxyhemoglobin, the standard pulse oximeter would give a falsely high reading. If you measure SaO2 with a co-oximeter, the greater number of wavelengths emitted gives you the ability to detect the other hemoglobins for a more accurate reading (in the case of metHb or carboxyHb: decreased SaO2).
Just remember that clinically, your patient will have an apparent SpO2 that is substantially higher, as CO makes hemoglobin appear saturated.
Yes, this is right. You'd have normal O2 Saturation, but the O2 binding capacity would be decreased. That's why I believe you'd look for P50 rather than the O2 sat in CO poisoning.
I believe that has more to do with the calculation of SaO2 by a standard pulse oximeter because they do not take into account other forms of hemoglobin (methemoglobin and carboxyhemoglobin). Despite the presence of methemoglobinemia or carboxyhemoglobin, the standard pulse oximeter would give a falsely high reading. If you measure SaO2 with a co-oximeter, the greater number of wavelengths emitted gives you the ability to detect the other hemoglobins for a more accurate reading (in the case of metHb or carboxyHb: decreased SaO2).
Agreed. pulse-ox in a CO poisoning is normal or "falsely elevated". Some sources (Robbins Review included) don't make a distinction between pulse-ox and co-ox though. I remember doing a question in Robbins that says the pulse-oximetry showed reduced SaO2. The rest of the vignette (and the answer choices) were clearly testing CO poisoning though.
One important point is that CO binding to Hgb actually shifts the O2 dissociation curve to the left (i.e. increasing oxygen affinity for hemoglobin) which decreases the amount of oxygen that dissociates from hemoglobin to the peripheral circulation.
So all in all, CO competes for the binding sites and decreases the amount of O2 carried by hemoglobin while simultaneously causing the Hgb to hold onto the few oxygen molecules that it does carry even more tightly, thus hampering tissue oxygenation even further.
So all in all, CO competes for the binding sites and decreases the amount of O2 carried by hemoglobin while simultaneously causing the Hgb to hold onto the few oxygen molecules that it does carry even more tightly, thus hampering tissue oxygenation even further.