- Joined
- Dec 14, 2004
- Messages
- 195
- Reaction score
- 4
Which specialist is more well-respected from the lay public point of view: cardiologist or medical oncologist?
Working in a cancer center, I find that there is a great deal of confusion about the differences between med onc, rad onc and surg onc from the general public and patient population.
Which is why I like to break it down simply for my patients:
Surg Onc - Cuts You
Rad Onc - Burns You
Med Onc - Poisons You
They all get it when you put it that way.
Which specialist is more well-respected from the lay public point of view: cardiologist or medical oncologist?
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=321971
this seems a bit familiar...i hope you're just a troll. if not, then please seek help.
-tm
Oh contraire, oncology is verrrrrrrrry sexy.
Which specialist is more well-respected from the lay public point of view: cardiologist or medical oncologist?
Just go to any clinic and ask any patient whether cardiologists or radiologists are more well respected as physicians.
Just out of curiosity, which specialty sounds sexier to the lay public: Neurology or Cardiology? What do you guys think?
I don't know about the lay public's view but among your peers, cardiology is universally hated and oncology is respected. Cardiologists are hated by radiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, vascular surgeons, and maybe a few others. Cardiologists have also gotten a lot of bad press lately for doing a lot of unnecessary angioplasties. I think everyone knows it's difficult to get into cardiology and respect their accomplishments, but a lot of people think cardiologists are money grubbing cath jockeys too.