CDP angle section

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

dl9006

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
541
Reaction score
2
does anyone else feel that some of the angles in CDP are wrong or is it just me?
it seems to me that no matter how many times I look, some of the answers always seem wrong...🙁


are the angles on the real DAT similar to the ones in CDP?
 
does anyone else feel that some of the angles in CDP are wrong or is it just me?
it seems to me that no matter how many times I look, some of the answers always seem wrong...🙁


are the angles on the real DAT similar to the ones in CDP?

I don't know about he angles being wrong but from what has been said on SDN is that CDP is harder than the actual DAT for PAT.
 
does anyone else feel that some of the angles in CDP are wrong or is it just me?
it seems to me that no matter how many times I look, some of the answers always seem wrong...🙁


are the angles on the real DAT similar to the ones in CDP?

yeap, for some of the angles it's so obvious that one is bigger than the other one, but the answer is something else!
In real DAT, people say that it's fairly comparable. Cube countings are apparently easier on the real DAT, but Angles are often harder, unfortunately!:scared:
 
yeap, for some of the angles it's so obvious that one is bigger than the other one, but the answer is something else!
In real DAT, people say that it's fairly comparable. Cube countings are apparently easier on the real DAT, but Angles are often harder, unfortunately!:scared:

no way... so the Angles in the real dat is harder than CDP angles??? 😱

or do you mean it's the real dat angles are just as hard as CDP?
 
Top