Okay I'll have to respectfully disagree here. I think, because the money attached to the PharmD at present, the # of students that have acceptances out of the area will take it no matter what. The presence of a school in the central valley (which arguably does need resources, health professionals, etc...) for a student in the area will not necessarily sway them into or out of the profession.
With that said, if someone is set on practicing in Fresno/Bakersfield/Stanislaus/etc... after pharm school WILL come back regardless of where they go.
What this school does is simply allow even more students at the lower end of the GPA scale (which, from personal experience, is how new schools attract students) admittance into an already crowded field of 110+ pharmacy schools. Students that couldn't have gotten into a better program will go here instead. After they're done, they'll be able to "buy" their way out of the central valley. This is what's happening in the midwest with towns dying, upwardly mobile people don't come back.
The other problem is, like CNCP, this school will open without regional accreditation but ACPE pre-accreditation. The consequences are such that, due to the lag time between the two, the entering class will be subject to more expensive/less favorable loan terms. What you're doing now is admitting a lower caliber entering class and saddling them with loans that is no longer in parity with the annual pharmacist's salary.
While I agree with you the CV needs better pharmacists/physicians/nurses/etc... simply plunking a school in CA, with its highly mobile population, is NOT the way to address this need. In fact, it'll make it worse.
And better yet, when the HSR project is finally built, it'll be entirely possible to commute from a more "desirable" part of the state to school each day.