- Joined
- Nov 15, 2003
- Messages
- 609
- Reaction score
- 0
I posted in the ob/gyn forum as well, so forgive my redundancy, but I realized that my question is really about pathology, too.
My friend recently got a letter with the results of her cervical biopsy, and she got worried over the language of the actual lab report. I am still a premed, so I have no references other than what I can glean over the Internet. She's very scared over all of this, so I want to be able to explain at least some of it to reassure her while she waits to talk to her doctor.
Here is what the report said:
A. endocervix, curettage:
Scant minute benign fragments of endocervical epithelium with acute inflammation.
B. Cervix, biopsy
Fragment of cervical mucosa at the transformation zone with koilocytotic atypia and marked acute and chronic cervicitis.
A is pretty straightforward. From what I've gotten so far from my Internet searches, it sounds like she does have the HPV virus, but the abnormal cells are not pre-cancerous. The doctor didn't mention HPV in the letter, just said that she had "a non-specific inflammation of the glands of the cervix".
Can anyone explain the results a little better, so I can reassure her?
My friend recently got a letter with the results of her cervical biopsy, and she got worried over the language of the actual lab report. I am still a premed, so I have no references other than what I can glean over the Internet. She's very scared over all of this, so I want to be able to explain at least some of it to reassure her while she waits to talk to her doctor.
Here is what the report said:
A. endocervix, curettage:
Scant minute benign fragments of endocervical epithelium with acute inflammation.
B. Cervix, biopsy
Fragment of cervical mucosa at the transformation zone with koilocytotic atypia and marked acute and chronic cervicitis.
A is pretty straightforward. From what I've gotten so far from my Internet searches, it sounds like she does have the HPV virus, but the abnormal cells are not pre-cancerous. The doctor didn't mention HPV in the letter, just said that she had "a non-specific inflammation of the glands of the cervix".
Can anyone explain the results a little better, so I can reassure her?