Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I am a 31 year old and here's my question: I am committed to getting into med school, but leery about the MCAT and how competitive I would be.
Historically, I'm probably marginally competitive: 3.5 or so in science, and 3.7 or so in non-science. As for pre-reqs, I did not excel in the physics arena (3.0 - 3.5), did good in chem (3.7-4.0), calc I forget but was probably 3.5ish+, 3.5 in one quarter of bio, and a sad 3.0 in one quarter of O-chem (had a 4.0 until the cruel final, which actually led to my first departure from MD school prep). Since then, I went to law school, did decent (no GPAs), and am an attorney practicing for about 5 years. Now I do a lot of elder care work, which is one of my life triggers to go back to MD school.
In short, I have a couple of pre-reqs that I need to do, or maybe re-take.
The question I have been pondering is the strategy: Should I: (1) go take the pre-reqs for a set period (probably 1-2 years), and then take the MCAT; (2) prep like heck for the MCAT and see whether my score would be prohibitive.
I'm a pretty good test taker, 95% on the LSAT, and I seem to read that the MCAT focuses on reasoning with a good dose of science background that I think I could learn through intensive study of class text books, practice problems, etc. [edit--I have been playing around with the MCAT prep books and tests, and certainly know that right now, I'd need a lot of work, but I don't feel like I would *need* to take classes to feel comfortable--but I could certainly be wrong about that if others have went through this experience.]
Have others gone and tested into the MCAT first, and then worked on the pre-reqs?
I guess there's a part curiosity and instant gratification component (how well will I do on the MCAT) and concern about spending years on pre-reqs. On the other hand, MCATs do seem to get stale as well with some schools.
I was just curious what folks who needed about a year or two years of part-time coursework did and where the MCAT fit in that process.
Anecdotal advice and/or statistical advice is greatly appreciated!
Historically, I'm probably marginally competitive: 3.5 or so in science, and 3.7 or so in non-science. As for pre-reqs, I did not excel in the physics arena (3.0 - 3.5), did good in chem (3.7-4.0), calc I forget but was probably 3.5ish+, 3.5 in one quarter of bio, and a sad 3.0 in one quarter of O-chem (had a 4.0 until the cruel final, which actually led to my first departure from MD school prep). Since then, I went to law school, did decent (no GPAs), and am an attorney practicing for about 5 years. Now I do a lot of elder care work, which is one of my life triggers to go back to MD school.
In short, I have a couple of pre-reqs that I need to do, or maybe re-take.
The question I have been pondering is the strategy: Should I: (1) go take the pre-reqs for a set period (probably 1-2 years), and then take the MCAT; (2) prep like heck for the MCAT and see whether my score would be prohibitive.
I'm a pretty good test taker, 95% on the LSAT, and I seem to read that the MCAT focuses on reasoning with a good dose of science background that I think I could learn through intensive study of class text books, practice problems, etc. [edit--I have been playing around with the MCAT prep books and tests, and certainly know that right now, I'd need a lot of work, but I don't feel like I would *need* to take classes to feel comfortable--but I could certainly be wrong about that if others have went through this experience.]
Have others gone and tested into the MCAT first, and then worked on the pre-reqs?
I guess there's a part curiosity and instant gratification component (how well will I do on the MCAT) and concern about spending years on pre-reqs. On the other hand, MCATs do seem to get stale as well with some schools.
I was just curious what folks who needed about a year or two years of part-time coursework did and where the MCAT fit in that process.
Anecdotal advice and/or statistical advice is greatly appreciated!