Chief Resident

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted1095841
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
How does one become a chief resident? What criteria? Process?
 
Depends on specialty, and program.

In my program in psych, “chief resident” is another exercise of self-flagellation. One that is unnecesary for fellowship (which in psych is noncompetitive), but may be helpful for clout in academia (i.e. stepping directly into an Associate PD role somewhere).
 
A big distinction to be made is the specialties where the chief resident has already graduated residency and is functioning as an attending (e.g. IM/peds) and the specialties were the chief resident is just a senior resident (e.g. surgery/surgical subspec/radiology/etc..). If the former situation, the person is doing an extra year in their training/academic paradigm. In the latter, the person is not.

Why do people become chief residents?
What do they do (compared to other residents)?
And do they typically pursue fellowships afterwards?

Why become a chief? Lots of different reasons to become a chief. Vox hit on some of the more career-enhancing aspects of it. His points are valid, though not universally applicable. Chief residency is considered an honorific of sorts. If chosen, you were deemed to have the leadership and administrative abilities above and beyond your colleagues. It's a very desirable line on a CV for any job (academics or PP).

I personally took on chief residency for different reasons than Vox mentions. I was in a medium sized radiology program and the program essentially let us self-select our 2 chiefs. Of 8 people in my class, half had no interest in the position. Of the other 4 (including myself), I thought two would do a terrible job. The chief resident has a lot of autonomy over the daily schedule and it's ripe for abuse with the wrong people. The other person I liked and I banded together and convinced the rest of the class and the PD that we were the best choices and they agreed.

(Side note: the class after mine chose people who scheduled a ton of academic days for themselves and their cronies and it was a bad look for everyone).

What do chiefs do? variable among programs and specialties but some of the bigger things are
Scheduling: We made the yearly rotation schedule and were primary managers of the daily schedule. (i.e. someone called out sick, we dealt with that).
Education: not my program in particular but in some programs the chiefs are responsible for organizing the resident lecture series
Interviewing: My co-chief and I participated in every residency interview day. We collectively interviewed every single candidate to the program and subsequently participated in rank order list discussions.

Then there's the people skills/putting-out-fires portion:
Being the go-between: Addressing issues that arise between the residents, the PD, your department's faculty, the hospital (/hospital leadership), and other departments. This can be a massive headache.

Being the bad-cop: Sorta related to the above point. Everyone's least favorite part - dealing with problematic/struggling residents. Not uncommonly did I have an attending grab me and tell me I needed to have words with a resident about their performance, attendance, or even attire (seriously). I did pull residents aside to have brief chats about those concerns, hopefully in a non-threatening way. If things didn't improve, I had to elevate those concerns to the PD. In our monthly residents meeting that my co-chief and I lead, we often had to tell people to do basic **** like show up on-time, show up to lecture, or log their duty hours.

Being the shoulder to cry on: The chief is commonly the first person people go to with personal problems (that may become work problems). I know it from experience, cuz I hassled my chiefs with my own stuff. Some of the stuff we dealt with: resident going through divorce, resident going through a serious healthcare issue, resident under CPS investigation, resident going through a tough pregnancy, resident struggling with single-parenting. Just whoosh.

For me, all that was on top of just being a senior resident. Depending on the program/specialty, "chief" responsibilities can be hoisted on 1-5 people.

Do chiefs pursue fellowship afterwards? Depends on the individual, specialty and goals. One of my ex's did an IM chief year and then went into primary care; her co-chiefs all did fellowship afterwards. In radiology, everyone does fellowship anyway.

How does one become a chief resident? What criteria? Process?

This varies from institution to institution. Some places it's more a decision of the PD or the faculty. Mine was more resident self-selected.

In general, you just pick your best residents. The ones that are the most clinically competent and have the best people skills. Some places put a lot of weight on the academic side; i.e. choosing from the high ITE and scholarly achievers.

The people picked are the ones that are predicted to best handle the load of chief responsibilities *on top* of their clinical work.
 
Last edited:
To add-on, it takes a certain kind of person.

For me, chief year was a masterclass in leadership and understanding complex institutions. There is a lot of "owning other peoples' problems" and being a middleman who has to implement and convey other people's priorities/complaints/etc...

I thought it was wonderful for seeing behind the curtain of how the residency program and hospital ran. It gives you a skill set well-suited to take on a leadership role in subsequent jobs. I was on the governing board of my PP group within 3 years of fellowship.

That being said, if you are more introverted and/or lack people skills it might be a struggle for you. I had enthusiastically recommended being chief to a junior resident of mine and he did not enjoy the experience. Similarly, if you have more of a clock-puncher, get-in/get-out mentality then you probably won't enjoy it. I can say my classmates who weren't chief resident had a much more pleasant R4 year than I did.
 
In the surgical world, typically all of the residents in their final years are referred to as chief residents. And with that they take on more leadership and admin roles for their services. You’re taking responsibility for directing the care of the whole census and the attending staff rely on them heavily. It’s a lot of work but also a lot of fun, you’re treated far more like a colleague and you and your staff are painfully aware of how little time is left before you’re done. It’s also not really optional.

I know the med world is different and it’s an additional year. In addition to the other reasons listed, I think there’s a great benefit derived from having attending privileges in a busy academic environment while also being something of a trainee. My fellowship was like this and it was an awesome year and prepared me to hit the ground running in practice. Being able to ask for help from senior people is awesome. You can still do that as an attending but there is a different level where you want your colleagues to think you’re competent as you build your reputation.
 
In the surgical world, typically all of the residents in their final years are referred to as chief residents. And with that they take on more leadership and admin roles for their services. You’re taking responsibility for directing the care of the whole census and the attending staff rely on them heavily. It’s a lot of work but also a lot of fun, you’re treated far more like a colleague and you and your staff are painfully aware of how little time is left before you’re done. It’s also not really optional.

I know the med world is different and it’s an additional year. In addition to the other reasons listed, I think there’s a great benefit derived from having attending privileges in a busy academic environment while also being something of a trainee. My fellowship was like this and it was an awesome year and prepared me to hit the ground running in practice. Being able to ask for help from senior people is awesome. You can still do that as an attending but there is a different level where you want your colleagues to think you’re competent as you build your reputation.

Agree with the bolded part 100%.
 
Thanks for all your responses!
Do chief residents often get hired as faculty at that same institution?
 
Thanks for all your responses!
Do chief residents often get hired as faculty at that same institution?

This is not a straight forward yes/no answer.

Most residents, chief or not, don't stay on or come back as faculty.... mainly because they choose not to work at their training institution. The majority of physicians go into community practice. My co-chief and I both interviewed for faculty spots at our home institution. We both got job offers and both politely declined them in favor of community jobs.

Assuming that you do want to stay on as faculty, yes you would have a leg up. If you want to stay at your home institution (for fellowship or as faculty), residency and chief residency are extended job interviews.
 
Most residents, chief or not, don't stay on or come back as faculty.... mainly because they choose not to work at their training institution. The majority of physicians go into community practice.
Does this depend on the region/institution? Most of my classmates say they want to go into academics, so I'm wondering if it's something that changes as people get older/go through residency or just small-sample bias.
 
Does this depend on the region/institution? Most of my classmates say they want to go into academics, so I'm wondering if it's something that changes as people get older/go through residency or just small-sample bias.

I doubt there's a regional bias. Maybe a top academic institution indoctrinates its med students so a slightly higher % stay in academics but unlikely to be a significant difference.

There's definitely something to be said about people changing priorities and stated preferences as they get older. When you're early in the medical training paradigm you're taught to pound your chest and profess your love of volunteering, teaching, and research (academic things). It's the game. This has been what's gotten you into college and medical school.... with higher levels of those things getting people into "better" programs. Academics tend to look down on community practice and the people who desire that.

The closer you get to the finish line (late residency/fellowship), the more quality of life issues come to the forefront. People can start to prioritize money and time off more. Some people don't want to work nights and weekends. Others don't want to spend their off hours writing manuscripts, making lectures or reviewing articles.

For those so inclined, there's plenty of non-revenue generating tasks that community groups need too: group leadership, hospital leadership, endless committees, multidisciplinary conferences, etc..... only you get compensated better.

My opinion of academics is you should only do it if you see teaching, research and/or high-level referral work as integral parts of your daily practice.
 
The percentage of people who want to go into academics drops the further along you go in medical training. Burnout is real, people get tired of research, there's always political issues that you become more and more aware of the higher up the residency latter you climb.

In terms of academics, people chose academic careers for a variety of factors - personal interest, prestige, or pragmatic. I picked my academic job because I like the diversity of rare cases seen in a big-name tertiary center, am interested in quality improvement, and enjoy working with medical students, residents, and specialists far more brilliant than I; I also accepted the position due to the location, culture, hours, call schedule (I work in a subspecialty with heavy call), and reasonably competitive salary (75-80% of community average). I wouldn't have accepted the position without the latter factors.

I think many people should consider, and interview at, both academic and community positions. All I'll say is that academics doesn't necessary entail extensive research at a pittance of a salary. Keep an open mind.
 
The percentage of people who want to go into academics drops the further along you go in medical training. Burnout is real, people get tired of research, there's always political issues that you become more and more aware of the higher up the residency latter you climb.

In terms of academics, people chose academic careers for a variety of factors - personal interest, prestige, or pragmatic. I picked my academic job because I like the diversity of rare cases seen in a big-name tertiary center, am interested in quality improvement, and enjoy working with medical students, residents, and specialists far more brilliant than I; I also accepted the position due to the location, culture, hours, call schedule (I work in a subspecialty with heavy call), and reasonably competitive salary (75-80% of community average). I wouldn't have accepted the position without the latter factors.

I think many people should consider, and interview at, both academic and community positions. All I'll say is that academics doesn't necessary entail extensive research at a pittance of a salary. Keep an open mind.
I'm interested in quality improvement too! But I'm not too thrilled about heavy call (I've had some night shifts in clinical rotations and I feel like a zombie). Which specialty are you in?
 
Which specialty are you in?
Neurohospitalist. It's not like you're being physically called into the hospital, but Q1-Q3 call is not uncommon in the field.

But call is a good example of the job decision. I don't want to be on call every night (I only do 20-something nights a year), I don't want to be called every time a stroke alert is called and make TNK decisions half-asleep (stroke fellow handles that), I don't want to have to read EEGs or have to go in to examine someone (senior resident can do those things), etc. Every patient I'm called about has already been seen by a resident. I'll take a pay cut for that.
 
Neurohospitalist. It's not like you're being physically called into the hospital, but Q1-Q3 call is not uncommon in the field.

But call is a good example of the job decision. I don't want to be on call every night (I only do 20-something nights a year), I don't want to be called every time a stroke alert is called and make TNK decisions half-asleep (stroke fellow handles that), I don't want to have to read EEGs or have to go in to examine someone (senior resident can do those things), etc. Every patient I'm called about has already been seen by a resident. I'll take a pay cut for that.

Very valid quality of life arguments in the other direction.
 
At my program being chief meant more work/stress/having to be the bad guy to other residents for the same amount of pay. There was not even a chief bonus. Chief was elected by residents and attendings/admin. There were two spots and I remember I had won the resident vote for one of the spots, but someone else had more admin endorsement. I had no issues at all saying "ok you get to be chief works for me". Im also in psychiatry so being chief doesnt matter at all for fellowships in my field, but may give you a slight edge in academic medicine.
 
Why do people become chief residents?
What do they do (compared to other residents)?
And do they typically pursue fellowships afterwards?

It varies. I did peds, so can speak to that. Though there are some peds programs who have chiefs as third year residents, most use recently graduated residents who are doing more administrative duties. The pay is usually a little better than a resident's pay, but not as good as an attending pay, and you do work clinically as an attending (I worked in local hospitals as the nursery staff, plus in the fast track in the ED and moonlighted in general pediatrics clinic doing evening clinic).

I became a chief because 1) I knew I wanted a break between residency and fellowship, 2) I wanted to be more involved in education.

Our cohort of chiefs was responsible for 1) doing the block schedule and day-to-day schedule, 2) figuring out staffing if people called out, 3) designing the conference schedule, 4) serving as a resident voice on several hospital committees, 5) dealing with any resident issues, including interprofessional issues, academic issues, and concerns raised by other residents/attendings as first line. In addition, we each had our own pet project that we worked on throughout the year.

Most of the chiefs from my program pursued fellowship--about 1 per year did not.

My chief experience allowed me to take over scheduling for my fellowship program when that was going awfully because no one was responsible for it. It also gave me a leg up when I worked on my advanced degree and has set me up well to do academic medicine--without doing the classic research route. I'm about to be named an associate program director and the PD has earmarked me to take over when he is ready to step down in the next couple years. I would 100% make the choice to be a chief again, though I have no desire to do a second chief year 🙂
 
Last edited:
How does one become a chief resident? What criteria? Process?

I trained in IM at a large academic program with 50+ residents per year. You could always tell who was on the chief resident short list because those were the ones assigned to our county hospital ICU or general ward month in July as a second year
 
It is highly specialty dependent with some specialties just calling their entire class of senior residents "Chiefs" vs other specialties where you have to add an additional year to training to be chief vs a couple of senior residents choosing to serve as a chief resident during their last year of training (this is how anesthesia is). When I thought about whether or not I wanted to apply to be chief at my program, there were a few factors that came up: 1) I could put it on my fellowship application, 2) a small bump in pay (PGY5 salary vs PGY4 for my last year), 3) I wanted to see a bit more of how a residency program works from the other side as I knew I wanted to go into academics at some point in my career and 4) having chief resident on your CV going forward will almost never hurt, even if you are going into private practice.
 
Top