- Joined
- Feb 21, 2021
- Messages
- 383
- Reaction score
- 811
I hate chronic pain patients coming into the ED. They say they are allergic to nsaids and want iv meds.
did they send them home with opiates?
Yup, after loading them up in the ER.
I hate chronic pain patients coming into the ED. They say they are allergic to nsaids and want iv meds.
did they send them home with opiates?
Dang I do sometimes just give a Percocet in the Ed since I need to keep my press Haney in check and doing that has kept my scores highYup, after loading them up in the ER.
I can fix basically every headache without opioids. I don't have the same success rate with back pain, and I don't feel bad about giving people a dose of an opioid to get them mobile enough to sleep in their own bed.Anyone who gives narcotics for migraine or non-traumatic back pain at my current job gets peer-reviewed. We had a few doctors (most were non-EM trained) in the past that were pretty liberal with opiates for headache and back pain and it turned the ER into a pain clinic.
This is it right here. Any low volume pathology is going to suffer the same fate.But since critically ill and injured children are a very small percentage of patients, it's not PROFITABLE to the businessmen of Medicine to do commit the money and resources. Therefore it's not going to get done.
Anything you read in the news will be woefully lacking in actual details. It’s always sad when a child loses their life. The fact that the article said she suffered severe abdominal pain from 2017 to 2021 tells you there is much, much more to this story.Not the USA, but wondering what is the differential for something missed here in an 11 year old.
11 yr old girl sent home for “constipation”…dies hours later.
Some kind of missed perforated viscus? And…ick…too young for an ectopic pregnancy problem right?
Schoolgirl sent home from A&E after docs say she has constipation dies next day
Annabel Greenhalgh, 11, was discharged from hospital after A&E doctors said she had constipation - but just hours later, her dad found her unresponsive at homewww.mirror.co.uk
I have no idea why you would assume an 11 year old is too young for an ectopic pregnancy. To be clear, I'm not saying I'm ok with that reality on any personal / ethical / parental / whatever level. I'm saying that I accept that it's a reality that occurs.And…ick…too young for an ectopic pregnancy problem right?
"Chronically ill child dies" doesn't hit quite the same way from a headline standpoint.I have no idea why you would assume an 11 year old is too young for an ectopic pregnancy. To be clear, I'm not saying I'm ok with that reality on any personal / ethical / parental / whatever level. I'm saying that I accept that it's a reality that occurs.
That said, as pointed out by @JacobMcCandles it seems there's likely a complex medical history at play given the reported several years of abdominal pain and hospitalizations.
It’s even better when they grab my extra stream of consciousness partially incorrect DRAFT HPI and make it theirsThe most shocking thing of this thread has been IM docs copying ER notes. Our notes look like nursing triage notes compared to theirs. I would consult hospitalists for an H&P if I could and bill it as their procedure.
Meningitis is always on the ddx for any kid <90 days old in the ER. Doubly so for < 30 days. That said, normal VS and normal exam besides "fussy" equals discharge with good return instructions and PCP followup. Are you suggesting that we LP these kids?Suppose you have a 5 day old infant show up in the ER with poor feeding, fussy/crying, etc but with no fever and with normal vital signs and normal exam other than being "fussy." How many of you would put that kid in sepsis protocol and be suspicious of meningitis?
Meningitis is always on the ddx for any kid <90 days old in the ER. Doubly so for < 30 days. That said, normal VS and normal exam besides "fussy" equals discharge with good return instructions and PCP followup. Are you suggesting that we LP these kids?
i've had similar thoughts when it comes to codes so far as a med peds resident. I've cared for a lot of sick kids, but for whatever reason I have yet to actually be present for a true cardiac arrest/respiratory arrest where more than like 10 seconds of CPR had to be done. this is at a major children's hospital with a lot of crazy pathology. I'd say it's true of the majority of my peds co-residents, I expect that many will graduate without ever having run a code themselves (in part because the PEM or PICU attendings/fellows would be running the ones that do happen). meanwhile over on the medicine side we've all been involved in dozens of codes at least and running codes is an expectation for residents.As an outsider I have a different perspective here. I am med/peds residency trained but once I finished residency decided to stick with kids because I like them a lot more than adults.
Anyways, critically ill peds patients are on a steep decline over the last 20 years and the results are making even peds residents far less skilled in treating them.
Example: I had 3 PICU rotations during residency, and I did a total of 15 intubations across all 3 months. 25 years ago residents during PICU rotations would have easily quadrupled that number. Furthermore only had 8 codes in those 3 months.
In comparison with my 3 MICU rotations I had over 50 intubations across those months and 40+ codes.
Now with the new RSV biologic beyfortus staring to become mainstream, the number of critically ill kids will fall much further.
In my private practice peds practice in the last 10 years I have only had to send 4 patients to the ER. That's a far lower ratio than what happened 30+ years ago when sending kids to the ER directly from clinic was WAY more common.
It's a good thing that the number of seriously sick kids is decreasing, but it also raises a conundrum because there's good arguments to be made that the lack of exposure/training on critically sick kids is causing the existing critical patients to get substandard care.
Suppose you have a 5 day old infant show up in the ER with poor feeding, fussy/crying, etc but with no fever and with normal vital signs and normal exam other than being "fussy." How many of you would put that kid in sepsis protocol and be suspicious of meningitis?
As an outsider I have a different perspective here. I am med/peds residency trained but once I finished residency decided to stick with kids because I like them a lot more than adults.
Anyways, critically ill peds patients are on a steep decline over the last 20 years and the results are making even peds residents far less skilled in treating them.
Example: I had 3 PICU rotations during residency, and I did a total of 15 intubations across all 3 months. 25 years ago residents during PICU rotations would have easily quadrupled that number. Furthermore only had 8 codes in those 3 months.
In comparison with my 3 MICU rotations I had over 50 intubations across those months and 40+ codes.
Now with the new RSV biologic beyfortus staring to become mainstream, the number of critically ill kids will fall much further.
In my private practice peds practice in the last 10 years I have only had to send 4 patients to the ER. That's a far lower ratio than what happened 30+ years ago when sending kids to the ER directly from clinic was WAY more common.
It's a good thing that the number of seriously sick kids is decreasing, but it also raises a conundrum because there's good arguments to be made that the lack of exposure/training on critically sick kids is causing the existing critical patients to get substandard care.
Suppose you have a 5 day old infant show up in the ER with poor feeding, fussy/crying, etc but with no fever and with normal vital signs and normal exam other than being "fussy." How many of you would put that kid in sepsis protocol and be suspicious of meningitis?