Originally posted by mommd2b
I think that one of the reasons that many people who have invested a lot in their education are choosing to have fewer children is that it often means sacrificing their careers.
From my experience, most people who choose small families are not even considering their careers. I babysat for a stockbroker's wife who had five kids, no job, few friends, and did no charity, and still had various babysitters and nannies 100+ hours a week. My boyfriend's mom had five kids and continued to work. My mom had two and stayed home. (And SHE, by the way, is the best mom on the planet! But I'm biased, of course.)
We went on several family vacations a year and both my brother and I had trusts for college and personal use (I used mine to be a ski bum, he to do a peace corps type program in Asia), and my brother and I are best friends (despite oceans, literally, between us) and I am pretty sure those opportunities are why my parents wanted a smaller family.
Today, I think people choose small families for those reasons still, but most people my age I know planning small families are primarily doing it out of social responsibility.
I'm a court appointed special advocate, which means I volunteer very extensively with childen who are wards of the state, and I see all these sweet kids whose parents don't have the ability to take care of them properly, in fact sometimes they're horribly abused, so I personally would have a hard time bringing more than two natural children into the world when I know there are other kids already born who need love and safety and proper care so desperately, and I could give it to them.
But also, I certainly understand that urge to have as many of your very own sweet cuddly babies as you can, so I say if you have the financial and emotional resources for a big family, more power to ya.
😍