Re-kindling the age old question: CHOP or Boston for pediatric training?
I'm struggling with putting together my rank list and have no idea how to weigh each program. I'm extremely invested in research, and both have strong, developed programs in my field.
I loved Children's on my interview day and they seem to speak to my inner researcher, but I worry about what my day-to-day pediatric training will look like. Will I be an excellent clinician when I leave there? Is the q4 call in years 2 and 3 overly taxing?
CHOP seems to have superb general pediatric training, but there is a LOT of time spent on the inpatient wards, and the program doesn't seem overly enthusiastic about carving out a research niche for oneself during residency. Is this impression true?
Both are absolutely amazing programs and I consider myself extremely lucky to be able to compare the two against one another... I just wonder if anyone has any additional insight beyond what is provided by the one day interview...
I'm struggling with putting together my rank list and have no idea how to weigh each program. I'm extremely invested in research, and both have strong, developed programs in my field.
I loved Children's on my interview day and they seem to speak to my inner researcher, but I worry about what my day-to-day pediatric training will look like. Will I be an excellent clinician when I leave there? Is the q4 call in years 2 and 3 overly taxing?
CHOP seems to have superb general pediatric training, but there is a LOT of time spent on the inpatient wards, and the program doesn't seem overly enthusiastic about carving out a research niche for oneself during residency. Is this impression true?
Both are absolutely amazing programs and I consider myself extremely lucky to be able to compare the two against one another... I just wonder if anyone has any additional insight beyond what is provided by the one day interview...