I'd echo the "who do you recommend temporarily", but since they apparently dodged that....
I wouldn't specifically look for # DVMs, Ultrasound, Radiology, etc.
I'd look for values.
There is a huge disparity in how veterinary medicine is practiced and, more specifically, what some owners want.
Some owners view pets as something they'll provide basic minimum care for (annual exam, vaccines, mayyyybe dental care) but when they get sick - it's empirical therapy (or at best minimal diagnostics) and see how things go.
Some owners want very aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic care on par with what is available for many people.
So the first thing I'd look for is how well that owner's "values" as pertaining to the care they want align with the vet. Some vets are far more comfortable with "minimum" levels of care. Some even prefer it and aren't comfortable with complex, advanced work-ups for problems. Some are. Suss that out, first.
Next I'd look at availability - how easy is it to get in? In today's world, that's a huge problem.
Then I'd look at other factors - does the owner strongly want to be able to do drop-off appts and does that vet allow those. Is the owner super demanding about callbacks immediately, and can the vet accommodate that.
For me, it's much less about specifically the level of care the vet can provide - it's whether that level of care matches the owner expectation.
We have a few local vets here who practice some serious old-timey medicine. They aren't bad guys, they just firmly are sticking to "shots yearly, and steroid/abx when it gets sick." Their clients LOVE LOVE LOVE them because they're self-selected for clients that want that type of medicine. They'd fail miserably with a client who would drop $4000 in a hot second for a CT and bronchoscopy.
Yanno?
Thanks for the informative comments
@LetItSnow.
In my town, many small animal veterinary clinics are owned by corporations. Many of these practices were formerly owned and operated by private practice veterinarians. The remaining (privately-held) small animal practices do not own much tech equipment whereas the corporate-owned practices own lots of in-house medical equipment that is used by multiple medical staff (e.g., surgery, radiology, neurology, orthopedics, etc.). The corporate-owned small animal clinics also have 24/7 multi-specialty emergency hospitals located conveniently nearby that are also owned by the same veterinary corporations. One of them is located next to a large veterinary diagnostic lab.
Now, that I think about it: I am not aware of any small animal veterinary clinic in my town that is offering urgent medical services for pets. Instead, they send the pet to one of the multi-specialty corporate-owned veterinary hospitals for emergent or specialty medical care.
Your comments about the
owner's values and the
owner's expectations are well-taken and made me think about *what* would I want if my own pet was ailing or injured?
If that occurred, I would want a full-service veterinary practice, with more than one veterinarian available 24/7, with access to high-end medical equipment and related medical specialty resources.
I have a comprehensive pet insurance policy for my pet. So, professional expertise and medical specialty resources would be very important to me. The pet insurance policy provides 90% reimbursement for all covered expenses - so that takes care of the veterinarian's fees and other covered medical expenses. In that case, nothing would be spared for my pet.
However ...
Based on your comments, it sounds as if a "back-up" small animal veterinary practice (at least, in my own town) would be practical for non-emergent veterinary care (e.g., annual wellness exam, routine dental, general practice veterinary matters) because I would
not expect the clinic to provide specialty medical care 24/7.
Right now, there are a handful of small animal clinics that offer that level of primary care in my town - so they would be suitable as back-up clinics when my pet's primary small animal veterinary clinic is not available.
Thanks for your comments!