- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
- Messages
- 430
- Reaction score
- 2
just send them pictures of cash, cars, and houses.
I actually lol'd. At work.
Sounds like a great idea, though. 😀
just send them pictures of cash, cars, and houses.
if you dont like it you can giiiiittttt outttttI really want to comment in the "United States has the Worst Health care" thread...but I don't wanna get yelled at by all the people satisfied with the current state of affairs.
I really want to comment in the "United States has the Worst Health care" thread...but I don't wanna get yelled at by all the people satisfied with the current state of affairs.
Just send them a picture of my berry meringue pie and tell them you were promised this if you get accepted. *Sage nod*
I'm neither a fan of controlling costs nor insurance. I have a feeling adcomms would murder me if I said that.No one should be satisfied with the current state of affairs - liberal or conservative. Its a mess. The health care reform was a good effort, and the soul behind it is a step in the right direction, but in all practicality it was butchered by special interests, the insurance lobbyists, obstructionist politics, and compromising with a side that had no interest in compromising other than to weaken the bill and its potential effects so their party wouldn't look so bad and have a mid-electoral chance rather than putting the American people first. It resulted in a weak bill that has some good qualities but doesn't do enough, and became essentially a hand out for the insurance companies to get even more profits by having all these mandated individuals to be insured without any mechanism of controlling costs or a competing public insurance to increase market competition. The irony of it all is that the bill which was passed is nearly identical to Republican proposals in the 90s and Nixon's own. Yet conservatives claim it is a socialism. Pot calling the kettle black a bit?
So we've put a short term band-aid on a huge problem, and took a step back by empowering insurance companies even more to screw over workers and health care practitioners.
But it works so amazingly in other high-tech healthcare societies like Japan and France! At one point in my life I agreed with you, but then I learned about the way some other countries have managed to solve the same problems we are facing in America. Most of them managed to solve the problems in a much better way than canada/britain, who have really been sort of a evil spectre in our public discourse about healthcare, keeping the US from any good changes. But the way Japan and France did it was by forcing insurance companies to be non-profit (still private, tho). It works amazingly but I can't see something like that passing in the US for a while, so don't worry about it if you're not a fan 😛I'm neither a fan of controlling costs nor insurance. I have a feeling adcomms would murder me if I said that.
But it works so amazingly in other high-tech healthcare societies like Japan and France! At one point in my life I agreed with you, but then I learned about the way some other countries have managed to solve the same problems we are facing in America. Most of them managed to solve the problems in a much better way than canada/britain, who have really been sort of a evil spectre in our public discourse about healthcare, keeping the US from any good changes. But the way Japan and France did it was by forcing insurance companies to be non-profit (still private, tho). It works amazingly but I can't see something like that passing in the US for a while, so don't worry about it if you're not a fan 😛
Access to medical care is a really loaded but ambiguous catchphrase of the HC debate. To me, it means 1. available physicians. 2. affordable cost.I like government intervention when it means all people having access to medical care. But then again, I am a bit of a socialist at heart.
I, however, realize it's impossible to just go cold turkey on our current system, and change instantly. But universal healthcare is something I'd like to see happen while I'm alive.
So I just saw inception and omg it was amazing. One of the better movies I've seen in a long time. So awesome. Though the ending was irritating. I hate endings like that
So I just saw inception and omg it was amazing. One of the better movies I've seen in a long time. So awesome. Though the ending was irritating. I hate endings like that
Access to medical care is a really loaded but ambiguous catchphrase of the HC debate. To me, it means 1. available physicians. 2. affordable cost.
Almost all of my visits are a $12 copay. That's pretty darn affordable, I think. I'm not sure how much insurance is annually, but I seem to recall the number 4,000. What if, instead of paying that 4,000, you could just use that money at your doctor? So instead of paying a $12 copay and then your doc being reimbursed another $36, what if you just gave him $50? It's just as affordable. Maybe that's a simplistic view, but I think it's totally plausible.
As for having docs in rural/underserved area, I think THAT is a much more difficult problem. Supply/demand can't work with government intervention, so the govt has to manufacture the cost disparity, or people won't want to do it. Again, just shifting money to the government. But in this case, I don't disagree as much. I'm not a total anarchist, I just think the answer is not ALWAYS government.
HEY! That's like a half spoiler! NOOOOOOOOO... I was gonna go see it tonight!So I just saw inception and omg it was amazing. One of the better movies I've seen in a long time. So awesome. Though the ending was irritating. I hate endings like that
I can agree with that!all i know is that insurance companies at present in the US suck ass
But it works so amazingly in other high-tech healthcare societies like Japan and France! At one point in my life I agreed with you, but then I learned about the way some other countries have managed to solve the same problems we are facing in America. Most of them managed to solve the problems in a much better way than canada/britain, who have really been sort of a evil spectre in our public discourse about healthcare, keeping the US from any good changes. But the way Japan and France did it was by forcing insurance companies to be non-profit (still private, tho). It works amazingly but I can't see something like that passing in the US for a while, so don't worry about it if you're not a fan 😛
lol sorry i didnt think it would spoil things too much. The movie was serious so amazing i cant put it into words. It was so hyped i thought i was going to be dissapointed but i def get the hype behind it.HEY! That's like a half spoiler! NOOOOOOOOO... I was gonna go see it tonight!
I can agree with that!
I would still argue that a free market system is inherently cheaper and more efficient and--even better--with the current information age, informed consumerism is totally possible. (psh like most consumers of anything these days are totally informed 🙄)
But I can see the merit in other systems. I've heard Australia works okay. However, I much prefer freer systems over governmental involvement. (non profit insurance companies is a pretty good idea.. although I still think "insurance" is a misnomer for the most part.)
Access to medical care is a really loaded but ambiguous catchphrase of the HC debate. To me, it means 1. available physicians. 2. affordable cost.
Almost all of my visits are a $12 copay. That's pretty darn affordable, I think. I'm not sure how much insurance is annually, but I seem to recall the number 4,000. What if, instead of paying that 4,000, you could just use that money at your doctor? So instead of paying a $12 copay and then your doc being reimbursed another $36, what if you just gave him $50? It's just as affordable. Maybe that's a simplistic view, but I think it's totally plausible.
As for having docs in rural/underserved area, I think THAT is a much more difficult problem. Supply/demand can't work with government intervention, so the govt has to manufacture the cost disparity, or people won't want to do it. Again, just shifting money to the government. But in this case, I don't disagree as much. I'm not a total anarchist, I just think the answer is not ALWAYS government.
But in Japan doctors get paid nothing....
Wasn't sure if you post was sarcastic or not 😀
Ew!! ew ew ew ew. I am afraid of Chuckie.Chuckie returns?
YAY Happy Birthday!!!!!!!!WTF???!!! That is SOOOO WEIRD!
I just passed by a gas-station and was like, today on SDN, I will post an ice-breaker question: what is your fave scent? and I will put gasoline.
And you guys beat me to it. That is creepy.
Also, it's my birfday todaaaaaaay!!!!!!!!!!😀
My lips are sealed.
Now now cliff, let's not get hasty. I said you would tell them you're awesome. Not that you are awesome.
Admit it, you love me. 😛

Ranting is what this thread is for.sorry about the rant.
yay UCLA and UCSD secondaries back to back. Super happy, but a bit overwhelmed. I've gotten so many today. Maybes they realized it was my birthday and wanted to be nice.
I thought it was for talking to oneself.Ranting is what this thread is for.
I thought it was for talking to oneself.
It wasn't sarcastic. Japanese doctors get paid average, and their medical school and college is free. But controlling physician compensation is not even close to the major way that Japan controls its healthcare costs, so I didn't mention it. Japan's system could be implemented here in America without changing physician compensation and it would work just as well
But yeah i agree: back to fun topics--food, sex, etc.
Yeah, it was the United States of Flow up in here last night
Oh, Flow.get...a...life... 🙂I am finally catching up on my TV watching....and of course watching SYTYCD first....from 7/7.....and I am crying about Alex🙁
Please, no one tell me what happens. I want to see what's going to unfold.
So. Freaking. Sad.
Also....sad that this happened 2 weeks ago and I had no idea🙁
get...a...life... 🙂
good point.I have a life....why do you think I haven't been watching TV?🙂
I just spent ten minutes staring at a sentence of my secondary essay where I had used the word "youth" in both the singular and plural. Eventually, I decided it might trip up a reader, and used the alternate plural "youths" in stead of one of them, but THAT DOESN'T GET ME MY TEN MINUTES BACK 😡
I just spent ten minutes staring at a sentence of my secondary essay where I had used the word "youth" in both the singular and plural. Eventually, I decided it might trip up a reader, and used the alternate plural "youths" in stead of one of them, but THAT DOESN'T GET ME MY TEN MINUTES BACK 😡
ah wussup guyyyssss
Not a whole lot. Deciding on a new haircut and seeing if I missed any of my shows.
What's up with you?
a few more secondaries. i want to be extremely happy, but then i look at my inbox and see the ratio of done/not done and it scares me lol
so i keep distracting myself into making plans for tomorrow night and the then when i get bored again i think about the following night....you get the picture lol
i have just been officially welcomed to the 21st century.
This is definitely fodder for a 2015 chat.unfortunately, my pcom essays will have to wait til the morning. Sorry pcom, i do love you though!
i just got the thing today. you're the one who holds secondaries for like 2 weeks.slacker!
i just got the thing today. you're the one who holds secondaries for like 2 weeks.
i just got the thing today. you're the one who holds secondaries for like 2 weeks.
i like to think of it as "brainstorming" 😉
lol, is this what pre-med trash-talking looks like?
I like that! I got one last week that I'm really struggling with. Not because they are hard questions but I just really don't feel like answering them. I keep coming up with excuses (clearly the best new one is summer school).