Clear liquids before colonoscopy

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Planktonmd

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
15+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
7,244
Reaction score
3,060
I know we discussed this before but I really would like to hear some input from attendings and residents concerning their institutional policy for NPO time before an elective colonoscopy.
Some of our GI guys want their patients to keep drinking Golytely or similar stuff up to 2 hours before the procedure, It doesn't bother me that much but some of my partners don't accept it.
Is Golytely a clear liquid?
Is it OK to administer GA (Propofol sedation if you prefer that name) to a patient who stopped drinking Golytely 2 hours ago?

Members don't see this ad.
 
I don't balk at the pt that had golytely just 2 hrs ago but I don't know if it is truly a clear liquid. I can't remember what its made of. I know I can google it.

But the bigger picture is that it is unnecessary to continue the sauce up to 2 hours b/r the procedure. AS long as the pt doesn't eat again after taking it.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Ditto. Assuming they havent downed a gallon of the stuff 2 hours prior. Had to delay a case once because the patient had drank 4 one liter bottles of water 2 hours prior.
 
Are you sure about that?
Golytely contains Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) 3350 which is not a very good thing to have in the lungs (case reports of fatal aspiration pneumonia after PEG aspiration), and it seems that it slows gastric emptying too:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...serid=10&md5=9bddad4b9b98af58030dfa522b0ec64f

It's clear, and by definition a liquid, but it ain't like water. It has a thick texture, not all that different from a smoothie.

It works REALLY well (trust me on this), and I drank mine about 16 hours before the actual procedure. About the only reason I could see for continuing it is that some patients simply don't follow their prep instructions (imagine that, non-compliant patients). They either A) don't stay on clear liquids the day prior to the procedure or B) don't drink all the prep, or C) both.

No way I'd do a MAC if someone had had this PO just two hours ahead of time.
 
GoLytely is a systemic alkalizer. Its also used in treatment of metabolic acidosis.
Severity of complications from aspiration depend on gastric volume and pH.
By forcing our patients into NPO status for 24+hrs, gastric pH is definitely more acidic!
Residual gastric volume might be an issue, but small amounts of clear liquids up to 2 hours before the procedure should be fine and will increase gastric pH and make your anesthetic SAFER.
 
All the above replies are intellectually stimulating.

They're also KINDA MEANINGLESS when it comes to NPO guidelines.

We're all in the game.

We all know the ASA guidelines and are taught, CULT LIKE, to recite them.

LIVE THEM.

Like some JIM JONES CYANIDE KOOL AID PARTY.

And yet if one REALLY analyzes the literature we have on NPO guidelines or if you're like me, lucky to have several analytical buddies who have the ability to decipher esoteric statistical data, one realizes the weakness of said studies.

then one considers additional cynicism.....the recent HUGE ANESTHESIA ACADEMIC STUDY SCANDALS...

http://www.anesthesiologynews.com/index.asp?section_id=3&show=dept&ses=ogst&issue_id=486&article_id=12634......which allows one to say to themselves...."wow......I've been in practice for a LONNNNNNG time following the literature......BUT......UHHHHHHH....my VAST clinical experience CONTRADICTS the literature....

AND THEN you consider YOUR personal experience with thousands and thousands of successful anesthetics.....with many, many "judgement calls" made with no deleterious sequelae...

All the above considered, I've come to the personal conclusion that

OUR NPO GUIDELINES ARE STUPID. ITS ONLY BECAUSE OF LITIGINOUS FEAR THAT MOST ANESTHESIOLOGISTS WHEN CONFRONTED WITH A "SOFT CALL" NPO ISSUE DEFER TO OUR STUPID NPO GUIDELINES.

Can't blame them for deferring.

Deferral of a case, though, because of a "soft" NPO call costs EVERYONE benjamins.

The hospital.

The surgeon.

The anesthesiologist.

The patient.

Think it really matters if a healthy patient drank a cup of creamed coffee on the way to the hospital, or even ate a light breakfast?

I don't, assuming you're astute enough to minimize gastric insufflation on induction....like....uhhhhh....pre O2, push 200mg propofol, wait for apnea, slam in the LMA #4, gentle ventilation until the dude starts breathing on his own or something similar....

Think it matters if a parturient for a C section ate a full meal five hours ago and she shows up for an elective C section? Think you need to wait for the "magic" eight hour mark?

I don't. She's a full stomach already as far as I'm concerned so a Junior Whopper with cheese five hours ago shouldnt make a difference.

I could go on and on.

The case Plank is talking about includes alotta stomach insufflation though, so considering that I'd probably defer. I recently posted a GI bleed case where I was glad I intubated the chick since the GI dudes gastric insufflation brought all the old blood that was sitting in the stomach UP AND OUTTA HER MOUTH like some horror movie.....

Aside from GI cases that require gastric insufflation, though, I'll continue to say that OUR NPO GUIDELINES ARE WAAAAAAAAAAY TOO PROTECTIVE.

Yeah, yeah, I know.

Theres f u kking personal injury lawyers every where in this country which means we're putting ourselves at risk legally if we practice outside our "all knowing academic guru's" studies.

I'm not asking you to practice outside the guidelines.

What I will do, though, is educate you on when to be REALLY CONCERNED......what clinical presentations/scenerios/situations when you should cancel/do an RSI/avoid an LMA.


OK.


Wait for it,

Wait for it....

JET'S SERIOUSLY SERIOUS NPO ISSUES 101 (I think this is a 4 credit undergraduate class at the U of Phoenix)

IF YOU SEE ANY OF THE STUFF LISTED BELOW, WORRY. REALLY WORRY. ABOUT ASPIRATION RISK, and protect the patient with 1)a little reverse trendelenberg when inducing 2)rapid sequence induction with no ventilation and CDAZY FAST insertion of an endotracheal tube 3)Selleck maneuver if you're so inclined but I don't think it makes a difference

1) Anyone with a true abdominal pathophysiologic state.....appendicitis, small/large bowel obstruction et al

2) Anyone with TRUE reflux......JESUS H, DUDES, "reflux" is a diagnosis like ADD. ITS EVERYWHERE! Most patients when queried, though, deny POSTURAL SYMPTOMS. And therein lies the key to giving anesthetic-concern-altering-info.....WHETHER OR NOT THE PATIENT HAS POSTURAL GERD. Does the patient have GERD symptoms when they lie flat, and have had to alter their lifestyle (incline the head of their bed to sleep, missing a PPI dose results in misery, etc) to accomodate? Then you need to worry. People with "GERD" who don't experience these kinda scenerios can be mask ventilated/LMAed IMHO.

3) Healthy patient who ate a TRUE MEAL (eggs, Popeyes biscuit, sausage) within the last 2 hours. Don't misunderstand me. I cancel the cases involving the satiated patient just like you do for the elective knee scope. What I AM saying, though, is if we practiced in a non-litiginous nation, I'm confident I could put an LMA in a healthy dude that showed up for a knee scope that ate a full meal three hours ago. And do it safely.

4) Anyone with TRUE GASTROPARETIC issues. This does not include every diabetic/renal patient.

5) Trauma patients. God only knows what these people have done before they arrived.

OK. Thats a good start to the TRUE NPO ISSUES.

I.E. NPO issues when you should REALLY WORRY as opposed to fearing getting sued for ignoring our "guidelines."

I'd enjoy your additions to my starting-list.
 
Last edited:
What do you primarily look at to discriminate between contenders and pretenders on #4?

Thats a really good question.

There is no right answer, but obviously we can include patients with primary esophageal and gastric motility disorders as primary players.

As well as diabetics and renal patients who manifest true end organ sequale as a result of their disease....PVD symptoms, retinopathy, a diabetic with a creatinine of 2.4 but not dialysis dependent...since they most likely have true gastroparesis as well.....

What I don't agree with is RSIing every diabetic/renal/obese patient, and/or not using an LMA because of the same considerations.

IMHO,

for example,

a well controlled IDDM/NIDDM patient can receive an LMA for an appropriate case, or does not need an RSI if an endotracheal tube is planned.

a well controlled renal patient can receive an LMA for an appropriate case, or does not need an RSI if an endotracheal tube is planned.

an obese patient can receive an LMA for an appropriate case, or does not need an RSI if an endotracheal tube is planned.

We can safely do LMAs or non-RSI inductions on healthy patients who show up for elective procedures who ate at IHOP greater than 2 hours ago.

We can certainly do elective cases on healthy patients who "forgot" and drank a cup of coffee on the way to the hospital.

My opinion.
 
Last edited:
I know we discussed this before but I really would like to hear some input from attendings and residents concerning their institutional policy for NPO time before an elective colonoscopy.
Some of our GI guys want their patients to keep drinking Golytely or similar stuff up to 2 hours before the procedure, It doesn't bother me that much but some of my partners don't accept it.
Is Golytely a clear liquid?
Is it OK to administer GA (Propofol sedation if you prefer that name) to a patient who stopped drinking Golytely 2 hours ago?

The worst case of chemical pneumonitis I've ever seen came from Go-lytely (actually second worst worst was aspirating Phospho-soda). When I did GI the physicians would routinely cancel cases if the patient had GO-lytely within six hours. My question would be if the GIs were doing sedation what would their policy be? My guess is its not Go-Lytely 2 hours prior to procedure.

My experience on the other side of the table largely mirrors Jets. I guess my main concern would be if they were to aspirate what would it likely be. If its water not so much of a problem. If its Go-Lytely or your going to suctioning a Chili dog out of there then thats a different issue.

David Carpenter, PA-C
 
JET'S SERIOUSLY SERIOUS NPO ISSUES 101 (I think this is a 4 credit undergraduate class at the U of Phoenix)

IF YOU SEE ANY OF THE STUFF LISTED BELOW, WORRY. REALLY WORRY. ABOUT ASPIRATION RISK, and protect the patient with 1)a little reverse trendelenberg when inducing 2)rapid sequence induction with no ventilation and CDAZY FAST insertion of an endotracheal tube 3)Selleck maneuver if you're so inclined but I don't think it makes a difference

1) Anyone with a true abdominal pathophysiologic state.....appendicitis, small/large bowel obstruction et al

2) Anyone with TRUE reflux......JESUS H, DUDES, "reflux" is a diagnosis like ADD. ITS EVERYWHERE! Most patients when queried, though, deny POSTURAL SYMPTOMS. And therein lies the key to giving anesthetic-concern-altering-info.....WHETHER OR NOT THE PATIENT HAS POSTURAL GERD. Does the patient have GERD symptoms when they lie flat, and have had to alter their lifestyle (incline the head of their bed to sleep, missing a PPI dose results in misery, etc) to accomodate? Then you need to worry. People with "GERD" who don't experience these kinda scenerios can be mask ventilated/LMAed IMHO.

3) Healthy patient who ate a TRUE MEAL (eggs, Popeyes biscuit, sausage) within the last 2 hours. Don't misunderstand me. I cancel the cases involving the satiated patient just like you do for the elective knee scope. What I AM saying, though, is if we practiced in a non-litiginous nation, I'm confident I could put an LMA in a healthy dude that showed up for a knee scope that ate a full meal three hours ago. And do it safely.

4) Anyone with TRUE GASTROPARETIC issues. This does not include every diabetic/renal patient.

5) Trauma patients. God only knows what these people have done before they arrived.

:bow:
 
Top