Clearing up some misconceptions about applying to residency as a Carib-grad

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

nshams

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
117
Reaction score
1
People on this board have this assumption that Carib-IMGs match less compared to FMG from India/Pakistan/Timbuktu/Britain/Australia. Not true.

Here's the hard data:

Established Carib schools Ross/St George/AUC/Saba: match rate 75%.
Newer Caribbean schools AUA/St James/MUA: match rate 70%
FMG(foreign citizens): match rate 40%.

This is because of 2 reasons:
1. FMGs need visas. Most Carib-grads who're applying in USA are American citizens and don't need visa.
2. Carib-grads complete 3rd & 4th year in US teaching hospitals. That means they have 2 years of US clinical experience with US LoRs to show for it. The majority of residency programs say in the application requirements: Need US clinical experience.

SDN is misinformed. (In large part because SDN-members are mostly AMGs who tend to be biased against Carib-grads).

Disclaimer: I'm not encouraging anyone to go Carib. Just stating the facts about residency as they stand right now.
 
Just out of curiosity, what are the attrition rates for FMG schools vs Carribean schools? Don't Carribean schools make you apply to be eligible for the match?
 
People on this board have this assumption that Carib-IMGs match less compared to FMG from India/Pakistan/Timbuktu/Britain/Australia. Not true.

Here's the hard data:

Established Carib schools Ross/St George/AUC/Saba: match rate 75%.
Newer Caribbean schools AUA/St James/MUA: match rate 70%
FMG(foreign citizens): match rate 40%.

This is because of 2 reasons:
1. FMGs need visas. Most Carib-grads who're applying in USA are American citizens and don't need visa.
2. Carib-grads complete 3rd & 4th year in US teaching hospitals. That means they have 2 years of US clinical experience with US LoRs to show for it. The majority of residency programs say in the application requirements: Need US clinical experience.

SDN is misinformed. (In large part because SDN-members are mostly AMGs who tend to be biased against Carib-grads).

Disclaimer: I'm not encouraging anyone to go Carib. Just stating the facts about residency as they stand right now.
That's funny. Somehow if you average the 75% match rate of some Carib schools with the 70% match rate of others you get a... 53.1% match rate? Mind you, that is better than the 47.6% match rate of non-US citizen FMGs, but the difference isn't anywhere near what you're saying.

Oh, and not to mention that 53.1% match rate is of the people the schools actually allow to graduate. A good 30+% of the students were kicked out before that point because they weren't allowed to take step 1 (or didn't pass step 1). Ditto with step 2. Or with difficulty finding clinical rotations.

Edit: Since you like "hard data" here's a link to the actual stuff put out by the NRMP. Table 4.
 
Last edited:
That's funny. Somehow if you average the 75% match rate of some Carib schools with the 70% match rate of others you get a... 53.1% match rate? Mind you, that is better than the 47.6% match rate of non-US citizen FMGs, but the difference isn't anywhere near what you're saying.

There are a LOT (lot) of Carib-medical schools. I used 7 specific schools because I know their match rates.

There are other Carib-schools outside of AUC/Ross/SGU/Saba & AUA/St James/MUA. The students who end up at these 6 schools tend to have more $ or better access to loans. So these schools have better rotation sites. These 7 specific schools also have better student quality - higher undergrad grades/MCAT which translates into better USMLE-scores compared to other carib schools.

Adding all students from AUC/Ross/SGU/Saba/AUA/St James/MUA who're applying to match every year together, you're looking at an applicant pool of about 2000-2500 Carib-grads who had good US clinical experience who're also American citizens.

From the table you've helpfully provided, there are about 5000 US-IMGs going into match every year.

Here's some other information of where those other applicants are coming from:
1. Some come from other, less established caribbean schools.
2. There are # of graduates from around the world (India/Pakistan/Nigeria etc) who have come to USA, worked hard for years outside medicine, finally have permanent resident status & enough money to apply to residency. These people are applying many years after medical school finished & without US Clinical Experience but as US-IMGs.

They unfortunately have a harder time getting into residency than Carib-grads who're typically 4th years when they apply with 2years of clinical exposure in USA.

Oh, and not to mention that 53.1% match rate is of the people the schools actually allow to graduate. A good 30+% of the students were kicked out before that point because they weren't allowed to take step 1 (or didn't pass step 1). Ditto with step 2. Or with difficulty finding clinical rotations.

The 30% attrition rate is probably an understatement. At Ross, I think the # is closer to 50%.

Edit: Since you like "hard data" here's a link to the actual stuff put out by the NRMP. Table 4.

I do like hard data. But I also like it when it's interpreted properly.

Again, I'm not encouraging anyone to go on the Carib-route. I'm just stating facts as they are.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen anybody claim that carib grads have a worse match rate than FMGs. The NRMP data supports that their is a difference in USIMGs vs non-US IMGs. For the most part, both IMGs and FMGs are thrown in the same boat.
 
I haven't seen anybody claim that carib grads have a worse match rate than FMGs.

You haven't been paying attention 😉

The NRMP data supports that their is a difference in USIMGs vs non-US IMGs. For the most part, both IMGs and FMGs are thrown in the same boat.

But they're not in the same boat. US-IMGs from big Carib schools tend to do significantly better than FMGs with permanent visas/US-citizenship who graduated from India/Pakistan/etc many years ago without US Clinical experience.

I thought sharing this info with you might be interesting, but it's academic debate for most of you. You're not going to be working with Carib-grads or FMGs, so it really doesn't mean anything.
 
You haven't been paying attention 😉



But they're not in the same boat. US-IMGs from big Carib schools tend to do significantly better than FMGs with permanent visas/US-citizenship who graduated from India/Pakistan/etc many years ago without US Clinical experience.

I thought sharing this info with you might be interesting, but it's academic debate for most of you. You're not going to be working with Carib-grads or FMGs, so it really doesn't mean anything.

They will.

They can very easily have an FMG/Carib grad as their chief resident/senior, co-interns, attendings, consulting physicians(or physicians who are consulting you).
 
Reality: AMG's get recruited over IMG's. That will not change. The debate is pointless
 
Top