And I have never come across a renal failure due to a bad pharmacy calculation. But I have seen many many renal toxicities due to a lack of pharmacy involvement in dosing of renally toxic medications.
I've given some thought as to how to respond to this comment. First, you're very fortunate - not so much that you haven't seen it, but more that you haven't had to deal with the personnel issues it brings up.
These incidents touches on your current thread - management, but also on some of the threads that appear occasionally - what school to go to, why, will I be a candidate for a particular job, what about a residency, why so much memorization, what's the point of calculus........
These 3 ARFs due to gent toxicity were the result on one person's calculations. Unfortunately, I followed her on each occasion the next day. She did everything "right" by the formulas & doing the math, but she didn't understand the source of the formula or why she couldn't use a particular number (lab value).
Although many of us tried to explain the kinetics of aminoglycoside dosing & the physiology of various disease states & why some of the lab values don't accurately reflect the actual body compartment the drug will be in, she never seemed to "get" it.
This is the difference between "learning" and "memorizing". This is why the pharmacist can't sit in the pharmacy with a link to the lab computer & crunch numbers. This is why the pharmacist actually has to go to the unit & read the chart, know what he/she is reading, know that a CABG pt will come back from the OR with a lot of fluid within the tissues, but that fluid will come off within a few hours. Thats why the pharmacist has to learn that when a pt gets an arteriogram with contrast, the renal function will bump.
This pharmacist never got that & somehow never could learn it from others. She was one who really never learned physiology, so when it came to trying to teach abnormal physiology to her, it was difficult & she didn't want to spend the time trying to learn it.
So....it resulted in her no longer being allowed to do kinetic dosing.
But, what does that teach us who are currently working & those of you still in school? For me - I've got to learn about each new procedure & process as well as the new drugs - not because I need to do a medical procedure (I don't!), I need to know what to expect physiologically after. Learning about each new drug will either reinforce my concepts of metabolism, excretion, handling, absorption & why & when any of those things can become distorted - or, it will open up a whole new area I've never learned about - like the biologicals - Enbrel & Humira.
For you students....you really need to "learn" the material. Learn why you can't rely on the serum creatinine which was drawn the day after your pt had an angiogram, what do you look for to evaluate hemodilution or hemoconcentration?
If you're in a school which teaches you & gives you exposure to these things - great - take advantage of them. If you're not, you must expect to learn them on your own, so be open minded and try to take every opportunity to be exposed to seeing pts in all sorts of settings. And...don't be frustrated because some dop won't hire you to do ICU staffing right off the bat. It costs the hospital a lot of money & time when the pharmacist screws up.
So....Zpak was fortunate to have always been with & hired great staff. But, we all have a responsibility to continue to educate ourselves & if we have the ability, to help educate those who need some extra assistance in the nicest & most respectful way we can....
Just more thoughts .........