I didn't discriminate between 'research' and 'clinical research' when I was looking into programs, so I don't even know how many programs offer a degree like that. However, I intend to study clinically-relevant topics almost exclusively in my future research.
I will be completing the AuD program first, then returning after my externship for the remainder of the PhD program. I have been told that it's approximately two additional years of study, as we have many research-foundation classes (such as System & Signal Theory, Lab Instrumentation, etc.) in our core program.
Here's how I see it...
Pros
- the broadened skill-set makes you a more desirable employee
- having clinical certification and experience will provide you with understanding, in addition to the extra weight your alphabet soup will carry in the research community
- if you later decide that research and/or teaching aren't where you belong, you have a Plan B
- in my program, at least, there are more assistantship positions for students pursuing a PhD than for those who are only interested in an AuD (I'm guessing that this is due to the research-based nature of most of the assistantship positions.)
Cons
- if you are impatient or do not enjoy school, the extra time will be torture
- increased costs, although PhD students are more often funded than AuD
I'm not as good at thinking of cons, but I gave you the disclosure statement on that! 🙂
Maybe I could give more detailed input if you gave me more of an idea of what your plan is and whether you'd be interested in a dual program, etc.
