# Colorblindness problem #81 Destroyer

#### Awuah29

##### Christian predent
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Guys, why are 50% of the daughters colorblind. I came up with 25%. Maybe I am missing something here.

Let see C= normal vision
c =colorblind

using the punnett square

Xc Y
XC XC Xc XC Y

Xc Xc Xc Xc Y

First girl carrier = normal 25%
Second girl = colorblind 25%

#### slashnroses19

##### Full Member
10+ Year Member
you did the punnett square correctly but you didn't interpret the results correctly. one daughter is color blind and the other one is a carrier. So, half the daughters are colorblind. The answer would be 25% if they asked the probability of their first CHILD being a colorblind daughter. check out the other punnett square problems, you'll see what i mean.

#### Awuah29

##### Christian predent
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
you did the punnett square correctly but you didn't interpret the results correctly. one daughter is color blind and the other one is a carrier. So, half the daughters are colorblind. The answer would be 25% if they asked the probability of their first CHILD being a colorblind daughter. check out the other punnett square problems, you'll see what i mean.

wait a minute, why is half the daughters colorblind . One is carrier Cc (normal)
and the other one is cc colorblind . I understand with the probability scenario, but how do we get half of the daughters colorblind.

ok, gonna give jim and nancy a call

#### Streetwolf

##### Ultra Senior Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member

It wants to know the % of colorblind DAUGHTERS not children. So you only look at the two daughters. Of the two daughters, one is colorblind. 1 out of 2 = 50%.

#### dantheman2007

##### Full Member
10+ Year Member
one daughter is colorblind, one is a carrier
so the probability of a daughter being color blind is one half or 50%
that is all there is to it.

#### markimark

##### Full Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
50% of the DAUGHTERS will be colorblind; that is, 25% of ALL THE KIDS will be colorblind.

watch out for the wording and what you're being asked.

This thread is more than 14 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons: