-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Combined FM/IM
Started by digambara
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
The question I have is why exactly would you want to do FP/IM? There is a lot of overlap and I don't really see a benefit to it. It will probably be a lot harder to convince two programs to make a combined program for you if it is not already established.
The benefit would come into play in regard to career flexibility, ability to specialize, and potential breadth of practice. I'd consider the IM/FM route if it were available nearby- I want the ability to specialize in an IM field down the road (if I go down that path), but would also like the training in OB and peds. A combined program gets you the ability to specialize and the ability to work with basically all patient populations for only one extra year of training, something that I find quite appealing as someone that wants to someday work in a rural environment where I might be one of the only providers in a hundred mile radius. Just figured I'd shine some light on the "why" of the IM/FM dual path, though OP could have entirely different motivations.The question I have is why exactly would you want to do FP/IM? There is a lot of overlap and I don't really see a benefit to it. It will probably be a lot harder to convince two programs to make a combined program for you if it is not already established.
If you are going to combine FM with something to be a super rural doc, why not just do EM/FM?
or Med/peds with a fellowship
I would like to know the answer to this question as well.
The benefit would come into play in regard to career flexibility, ability to specialize, and potential breadth of practice. I'd consider the IM/FM route if it were available nearby- I want the ability to specialize in an IM field down the road (if I go down that path), but would also like the training in OB and peds. A combined program gets you the ability to specialize and the ability to work with basically all patient populations for only one extra year of training, something that I find quite appealing as someone that wants to someday work in a rural environment where I might be one of the only providers in a hundred mile radius. Just figured I'd shine some light on the "why" of the IM/FM dual path, though OP could have entirely different motivations.
In your situation, I would look at IM-Peds programs. Admittedly that doesn't give you exposure to OB but, in the right program, you can certainly have adequate preparation to do any outpatient gyn you want after residency. In my experience, it is very hard to do OB well from many FM programs especially if you are interested in rural practice where you will not have much (and perhaps no) backup. From my perspective, most rural destined physicians would be best off deciding if they want to do OB and if they do then they should pursue an OB-Gyn residency.