- Joined
- Jan 9, 2003
- Messages
- 1,067
- Reaction score
- 4
I'm confused about your statement. I agree that someone should not be penalized for taking classes at a CC. It also depends on what everyone means by "CC." People tend to use it as a catch all between 2 year colleges and public open admission colleges. These are two different things. Most (if not all) 2 year colleges are open admission, but an open admission college is not necessarily a 2 year college. I guess it all comes down to what they are accredited as. If a 2 year college is teaching upper level O chem then that would be questionable, however if an open admission 4 year CC offers O chem, then there is no valid reason to question it unless they are not regionally accredited.Lindyhopper said:In defense of the committee, they do not want to discourage anyone from taking "extra" courses. If two people have taken all or most of the requirements at a 4 year school, & than one goes on to take additional courses at a CC that person should not be penalized. You may not agree, but they have a reasonable position.
The confusing thing about the statement from UNECOM is that they seem to be saying "If you take your prereqs (which are mostly lower level classes) at a CC, we may not like them. Take them at a big university where your lab instructors will be grad students instead. If, however, you want to take advanced classes that are above and beyond the prereqs, and are much more intensive, a CC is fine." WTF
For fun, check out the current Surgeon General's CV:
http://www.hhs.gov/about/bios/sg.html
He got a GED, and got an Associate of Arts from a CC.