Just wondering if one were to scramble into a prelim year, would you be more competitive with a year under your belt or same as the previous unmatched year?
Just wondering if one were to scramble into a prelim year, would you be more competitive with a year under your belt or same as the previous unmatched year?
You would be slightly less competitive after doing a prelim year. A transitional year would make you slightly more competitive as it won't hurt your Medicare funding, but TY spots are pretty competitive and hence hard to scramble into.
You would be slightly less competitive after doing a prelim year. A transitional year would make you slightly more competitive as it won't hurt your Medicare funding, but TY spots are pretty competitive and hence hard to scramble into.
I didn't know that transitional year did not affect your funding. Interesting. It seems there is much that the young pad-won has to learn.
So when you say that transitional would make you slightly more competitive, would this be more competitive than a prelim year or than the previous unmatched year. I know it is a hard call to make.
Should this perhaps be "It seems there is much the young - awon has to learn"
I've always heard having a year (or two) under your belt only makes you a stronger candidate. This may vary from program to program, because of the funding issue, which according to toxic may or may not even be a consideration. Cheap labor is still cheap labor, and with a year under your belt, you are extra cheap labor (pgy-2 labor for pgy-1 salary) that has a year's practice at "moving the meat," so to speak.
Of course, this is only what I heard from my neighbor's boyfriend's second college room-mate's sisters hamster, so YMMV.
That was a lot of babbling.. off to another thread.
This site uses cookies to help personalize content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies and terms of service.