- Joined
- Aug 19, 2002
- Messages
- 1,585
- Reaction score
- 12
Doc Ollie, Kim, anyone else with experience, share your thoughts of this:
Currently we have a 400 lb woman who blew her j-j anastamosis on day 3 after an open procedure. She went back urgently and underwent primary repair with drainage. Subsequently, she opened up what initially appeared to be a controlled leak, then spiraled into sepsis with multi organ system failure requiring re-exploration.
Enter Dr. womansurg at this point (I wasn't involved in initial 2 surgeries). On exploration, she had the most hostile abdomen I have encountered. She was blocked in with adhesions and inflammation, and it took a good hour to even define interloop planes and release the seared on omentum (naturally, she was hypotensive and intermittently unable to be ventilated as we worked...). Her j-j was again wide open with widespread peritonitis and countless interloop abscesses. The epigastric region harbored a large abscess, and the g-j was disrupted with nasogastric tube lying free in the abdomen. This was the most difficult exposure of my young career. Imagine: the GE junction is difficult access in a virgin belly of normal sized person. Now add 400+ pound morbid obesity, now add massive inflammation, mesenteric foreshortening and tissue which is hugely edematous, friable, and with nearly unrecognizable tissue planes. O my.
We set up the Thompson retractor, my attending reached in and, with his arms shaking violently from the effort, managed to retract just enough that I had about a 2 inch wide window that stretched down to reveal the gastric pouch stump at the bottom of a narrow, black hole. Wearing a headlamp and using 18 inch long instruments, I was just able to see enough to cut back to fresh edges on each stump, and perform a hand sewn, practically esophagojejunal anastamosis (given that so little gastric tissue remained). We then repaired the J-J, by dividing about 10cm on each limb to fresh tissue, and performing two separate anastamoses for the re-establishment of j-j continuity, and then the re-introduction of the hepatopancreatic limb. We brought out a gastric tube from the gastric remnent, placed drains, and got out.
So far, although she remains critically unstable, there is no sign of anastamotic breakdown after one week. Although I would never choose to re-anastamose in the setting of widespread intrabdominal sepsis if I could help it, I'm not sure what other options remain here, as the anastamoses are so very proximal. Someone mentioned treating it as a difficult duodenal stump, placing lateral duodenostomy tube, so forth. In fact, I believe that the GT does decompress this limb effectively (after revision, the jejunal segment was very close to ligament of Trietz), so I don't think that method of decompression would add anything other than additional risk.
I'm curious how you might have seen leak complications managed, whether diversion was ever used and, if so, by what method, and what the outcomes were. Our leak rate at the moment is 4%, consistent with other published series, and we've not had any deaths from any of them (we'll see how this one turns out...). Given that the published mortality of a j-j leak is 50%, I feel that we must be doing something right with our management.
thanks guys,
-ws
Currently we have a 400 lb woman who blew her j-j anastamosis on day 3 after an open procedure. She went back urgently and underwent primary repair with drainage. Subsequently, she opened up what initially appeared to be a controlled leak, then spiraled into sepsis with multi organ system failure requiring re-exploration.
Enter Dr. womansurg at this point (I wasn't involved in initial 2 surgeries). On exploration, she had the most hostile abdomen I have encountered. She was blocked in with adhesions and inflammation, and it took a good hour to even define interloop planes and release the seared on omentum (naturally, she was hypotensive and intermittently unable to be ventilated as we worked...). Her j-j was again wide open with widespread peritonitis and countless interloop abscesses. The epigastric region harbored a large abscess, and the g-j was disrupted with nasogastric tube lying free in the abdomen. This was the most difficult exposure of my young career. Imagine: the GE junction is difficult access in a virgin belly of normal sized person. Now add 400+ pound morbid obesity, now add massive inflammation, mesenteric foreshortening and tissue which is hugely edematous, friable, and with nearly unrecognizable tissue planes. O my.
We set up the Thompson retractor, my attending reached in and, with his arms shaking violently from the effort, managed to retract just enough that I had about a 2 inch wide window that stretched down to reveal the gastric pouch stump at the bottom of a narrow, black hole. Wearing a headlamp and using 18 inch long instruments, I was just able to see enough to cut back to fresh edges on each stump, and perform a hand sewn, practically esophagojejunal anastamosis (given that so little gastric tissue remained). We then repaired the J-J, by dividing about 10cm on each limb to fresh tissue, and performing two separate anastamoses for the re-establishment of j-j continuity, and then the re-introduction of the hepatopancreatic limb. We brought out a gastric tube from the gastric remnent, placed drains, and got out.
So far, although she remains critically unstable, there is no sign of anastamotic breakdown after one week. Although I would never choose to re-anastamose in the setting of widespread intrabdominal sepsis if I could help it, I'm not sure what other options remain here, as the anastamoses are so very proximal. Someone mentioned treating it as a difficult duodenal stump, placing lateral duodenostomy tube, so forth. In fact, I believe that the GT does decompress this limb effectively (after revision, the jejunal segment was very close to ligament of Trietz), so I don't think that method of decompression would add anything other than additional risk.
I'm curious how you might have seen leak complications managed, whether diversion was ever used and, if so, by what method, and what the outcomes were. Our leak rate at the moment is 4%, consistent with other published series, and we've not had any deaths from any of them (we'll see how this one turns out...). Given that the published mortality of a j-j leak is 50%, I feel that we must be doing something right with our management.
thanks guys,
-ws