- Joined
- Jul 3, 2005
- Messages
- 41
- Reaction score
- 0
for those that took part 1 on the computer...how long did it take to get your scores back.
3rdmolarslayer said:for those that took part 1 on the computer...how long did it take to get your scores back.
3rdmolarslayer said:for those that took part 1 on the computer...how long did it take to get your scores back.
InMyCrossHairs said:but it seems like a 91 may not be as good of score as it used to be.QUOTE]
Isn't it graded on a curve so a 91 today is the same as a 91 ten years ago. I think only a certain percentage of test takers get above 90.
dc-10 said:InMyCrossHairs said:but it seems like a 91 may not be as good of score as it used to be.QUOTE]
Isn't it graded on a curve so a 91 today is the same as a 91 ten years ago. I think only a certain percentage of test takers get above 90.
From what I understand that isnt the case. I was told by someone at the ADA, and I cant remember her name (she was in the testing department however), that when you take the computerized test, the scores, ie a 75 or 90 for that matter, are already determined by the correct # of responses. So for instance, if test A is deemed to have a difficulty level of "x" and you respond with 65 correct responses you will get a score 0f 90, but test "b" may be less difficult so you need 70 correct responses to achieve the same score of 90. And with this predetermined scale, everyone taking the test could conceivably score above 90. That is how I was led to believe the tests were scored.
InMyCrossHairs said:Got my scores, 91 overall, but I was surprised at the wide range in my scores and also surprised by the sections I scored worst/best in. Initially I thought that just getting in the 90's would help me get into a specialty, but it seems like a 91 may not be as good of score as it used to be. Oh well, if i cant get my first choice of specialty, OMFS, I could always just be a periodontist...NOT
InMyCrossHairs said:Got my scores, 91 overall, but I was surprised at the wide range in my scores and also surprised by the sections I scored worst/best in. Initially I thought that just getting in the 90's would help me get into a specialty, but it seems like a 91 may not be as good of score as it used to be. Oh well, if i cant get my first choice of specialty, OMFS, I could always just be a periodontist...NOT
Supernova2008 said:How long did you study to get to the level where you felt that you could make a 90, and with that being said, what score did you feel that you had made when you walked out of the Prometric center on test day ?
dc-10 said:From talking to your classmates, do you think you would have been better off (ie higher score) with the written. The smartest kid in my class got a 93 on the computerized, and I can't help but wonder if he would have gotten a higher score on the written. Last year it seemed like everyone who posted in this forum got like a 96,97 or 98 on the written.
InMyCrossHairs said:This question is being thrown around right now at my school because scores seem to be unusually low compared to scores in the past on the written exam. I cant say whether I would have scored higher on the written or not, but what I can say is that I was surprised that some of my classmates who were going through old exams the week prior were consistantly scoring 99's and when scores came back only a handful had scored in the 90's and they were low 90's.