thismeanswar said:
also, I'm extremely interested in going into neurology but would like to be involved in both the clinical and research areas of this specialty. Does an M.D. / Ph.D. (neuroscience) make the most sense for this career goal?
It really depends on what type of career you are interested in. The MD/PhD training will prepare you well for a career in both clinical medicine and basic research. For clinical research, the conventional wisdom suggests that getting a Ph.D. would not be of sufficient benefit to warrant spending the extra years doing so.
In reality, getting a Ph.D. is not necessary to do either basic or clinical research. However, the extra training/experience will increase your qualifications and ability to conduct research. The MD does not prepare you for basic research, so most who go the MD-only research route end up taking time during medical school (i.e. 1 year) and fellowship to be in the lab and learn how to be a scientist.
For neurology, a Ph.D. in neuroscience makes the most sense. However, it is not essential to get your PhD in an area that relates to your clinical field of interest. Conversely, doing a PhD in neuroscience does not guarantee that your research will relate in any way to the clinical field of neurology.
Since you have already expressed interest in neurology and neuroscience, make sure that you find mentors in these clinical and basic science fields. When applying, pick out some specific areas in which you are interested and then find the people working in that area. That way, you can arrange to interview with them when visiting programs for interviews.
Feel free to PM me if you would like more specifics...