Confusion About Abstract Publications, Please Help

[Premed2003]

---

Members don't see this ad.

I'm second author on an abstract publication for clinical research. For my 510 character description, I'm writing the title of the abstract publication and reiterating that the clinical research led to an abstract pub that was presented, and an article about it was published in another journal. Is this good?

For title, do I write Abstract Author?

And for # of hours, and duration, do I write the time that I worked on the research?
Thanks.

 

[Jedi In Training]

Unless you went to the conference and presented the abstract/poster, I would focus on the fact that you did research. Use "Clinical Research" as the title of your activity, and talk about your project and the publication of an abstract in the description space. Don't forget to write about techniques you learned and other people you trained. Moreover, if you were not a co-author on the other papers, I wouldn't mention them. List the average number of hours you spent working on the project per week.

 

[Premed2003]

Thanks. I'm going to clarify..

I did clinical work and research 1 summer 40 hours/week. So in 1 post-secondary experience I said my clinical duties and a sentence about what my research was about.

Then, for another secondary experience, I am listing the publication. I didn't go to present the paper, but I was 2nd author and did the work for it. I can't list the abstract citation in the post-secondary experience about the whole summer clinical work and research job because there isn't enough room.

So, I'm planning to list them separately. This is right, correct?

Thanks

 

[Tweetie_bird]

that's exactly what I'm doing.

I've had to talk about my reesarch/patient experience as a separate post sec exp, and had to list my publications as separate.

 

[Premed2003]

Thanks Tweetie

What are you writing for your "Title" for your publications? Are you writing "Author"?