- Joined
- Apr 14, 2009
- Messages
- 2,948
- Reaction score
- 660
Ok. Weird question, maybe.
I had a lot of time to study for the MCAT (two full years), so I ended up using a lot of different books (BR, PR, EK, etc.). I ended up making a compilation of notes for easier review. It's typed up and separated by sections. I think it's around 150 pages, so it's pretty much just distilled facts.
I feel bad just kind of throwing this away, especially when I put so much time into making it pretty and grammatically correct to satisfy my OCD concerns. So I was wondering if posting my notes to SDN is a violation of the copyrights of the books. I mean, technically I paraphrased everything, included no sample questions, and mixed and matched a lot (although with BR being the heaviest in content a lot is taken from that book).
So, is it ok because they're just facts you could get from any science book, or is the organization of those facts into separate chapters copyrighted? I ask because of the whole copyright fiasco over the spreadsheet a year or so back...
I had a lot of time to study for the MCAT (two full years), so I ended up using a lot of different books (BR, PR, EK, etc.). I ended up making a compilation of notes for easier review. It's typed up and separated by sections. I think it's around 150 pages, so it's pretty much just distilled facts.
I feel bad just kind of throwing this away, especially when I put so much time into making it pretty and grammatically correct to satisfy my OCD concerns. So I was wondering if posting my notes to SDN is a violation of the copyrights of the books. I mean, technically I paraphrased everything, included no sample questions, and mixed and matched a lot (although with BR being the heaviest in content a lot is taken from that book).
So, is it ok because they're just facts you could get from any science book, or is the organization of those facts into separate chapters copyrighted? I ask because of the whole copyright fiasco over the spreadsheet a year or so back...