1. Location may be a factor, but should be minor when discussing medical educational experiences for these two schools. Both schools have extensive rotation choices where your experiences will be diverse. Cornell's surroundings and living areas are plusher, Columbia's are a little more sketchy. Your mother may think you are "safer" at Cornell, but your mom isn't the one going to school. Where do you feel better? Educational experiences and opportunities are excellent at both.
2. Match lists: Both fabulous BUT, duh, Columbia is known for surgery. It's great that that they are getting money finally for neuro. Go there if that is what you want. It's a wonderful choice. Interested in ortho (Hospital for Special Surgery), cancer (Memorial Sloan Kettering), research (Rockefeller), than Cornell is the place for you. Again, many choices, many options. And don't be fooled by the numbers going in to any one particular residency for any one particular year, because that is all that it is---one year. There may not have been 30 candidates who were interested in a particular specialty that year. Instead, look at the overall match. They were both outstanding. Some people will have to nit-pick to prove that one school is better than the other as far as match goes. This may be true when comparing Ross to Harvard, but not when comparing Cornell to Columbia. Don't be sucked in by penis envy.
3. Going out in NY: That is entirely up to you. How much studying you need to do on weekends is your choice. Med School is not college. The vast volume of work is sometimes unbelieveable so you may have to give up a Friday or Saturday night every now and then. This is probably true at both schools and IMO, is not a reason to pick one school over the other, but that is me.If you want to get really picky, Cornell is decidedly closer to most museums, theaters, clubs, etc., and is an easy walk to most places. But, as many will also point out, Columbia is just a train ride away and closer to a subway stop.
4. PBL vs. lecture. Again, for the 900th time, Cornell is NOT ALL PBL. Never has been, never will be. Some love PBL, some hate it, some are indifferent, but at least, FOR ME, it beats sitting in a boring lecture. Plus, you get out at 1:00 on most days giving you a chance to explore, sleep, study, exercise, do research, etc. What type of person are you and what do you like? Do you want to hear a professor drone on and on or do you want to be a part-time participant in your own education? (One PBL drawback-some classes have really annoying gunner-types that monopolize the profs time as well as the session. They are well-hated by the rest of the class, so don't be one!!!!)
5. Reputation and rankings: Do not pick a school based on this. Really. Please don't. Many in my class gave up higher ranked schools for a variety of reasons and are very happy that they did.
6. The bottom line: Where did you feel good? Where did you like the other students? Where did you feel both mentally and physically comfortable? Where did you like the approach to teaching? Where are the better opportunities FOR YOU. You should not have to be convinced by me or anyone else on SDN that Columbia is the only place to go or that Cornell is better in any # of areas. This debate between the two schools has gone on forever and will probably never reach a conclusion so it is up to you, the accepted student, to pick the school that is best for YOU--and not for anyone else looking around this thread
7. Finally, after my long rant, good luck to you all in making your decision. You are all very fortunate to have this choice. And remember, you will receive an excellent education at either institution, so sometimes, even after weeks of rationalization, you may be better off going with your gut feeling.
