- Joined
- Mar 15, 2005
- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Sure your licensed. 007 - license to kill. it's akin to obtaining an online degree from some bogus university for $59.99. Those claiming to have training in "cosmetic surgery" without prior accredited PRS training are bull**** plain and simple. should be outlawed all together. that way your aunt who has no idea avoids a face lift from a "cosmetic surgeon" (i.e. dentist with a scalpel) and the complications associated with it. exploitation of our field is horrible exposure.zbarnes said:short answer is no, those are unofficial "fellowships", but im sure they take the time to print up a diploma of some sort.

slickster said:Sure your licensed. 007 - license to kill. it's akin to obtaining an online degree from some bogus university for $59.99. Those claiming to have training in "cosmetic surgery" without prior accredited PRS training are bull**** plain and simple. should be outlawed all together. that way your aunt who has no idea avoids a face lift from a "cosmetic surgeon" (i.e. dentist with a scalpel) and the complications associated with it. exploitation of our field is horrible exposure.![]()
slickster said:Sure your licensed. 007 - license to kill. it's akin to obtaining an online degree from some bogus university for $59.99. Those claiming to have training in "cosmetic surgery" without prior accredited PRS training are bull**** plain and simple. should be outlawed all together. that way your aunt who has no idea avoids a face lift from a "cosmetic surgeon" (i.e. dentist with a scalpel) and the complications associated with it. exploitation of our field is horrible exposure.![]()
Of course it is (it was a semi-rhetorical question). This is all about money.River13 said:And as asked previously, why don't people-like the above poster-whine about face trauma and how it's done by "dentists"? Could it be because trauma is poorly reimbursed? That's what I thought...
River13 said:Interestingly many of these "cosmetic surgeons" have received MORE training during their residencies in actual cosmetic procedures than your average PRS resident...so which is more qualified? The one with the "PRS" title and virtually no experience or the one with the "cosmetic surgeon" title who's received vast experience? And as asked previously, why don't people-like the above poster-talk about face trauma and how it's done by "dentists"? Could it be because trauma is poorly reimbursed? That's what I thought...
jdubya said:Maybe it's not just about the money. Maybe it's about how hard it is to get into medical school and how less so it is to get into dental school. Maybe its about some of us have worked our butts off through high school, undergrad, four years of medical school and 6 or 8 years of residency for the privelege of these procedures and others have taken the shorter and easier route. I've got nothing against dentists, but I've got nothing against scrub techs either, and I don't think dentists or scrub techs should be privy to physician procedures without being a physician no matter how many they have seen or assisted on. And, by the way, I can feel your response welling up saying that you have worked as hard as any medical student and your talents are certainly as numerous, but without an MD behind your name, I don't buy it. I know you have to be near the top of your dental school class to get an OMFS fellowship, I also know you have to be at the top of your medical school class to get into plastics and of the fish that fill these two ponds, the bigger fish go to medical school.
jdubya said:Maybe it's not just about the money. Maybe it's about how hard it is to get into medical school and how less so it is to get into dental school. Maybe its about some of us have worked our butts off through high school, undergrad, four years of medical school and 6 or 8 years of residency for the privelege of these procedures and others have taken the shorter and easier route. I've got nothing against dentists, but I've got nothing against scrub techs either, and I don't think dentists or scrub techs should be privy to physician procedures without being a physician no matter how many they have seen or assisted on. And, by the way, I can feel your response welling up saying that you have worked as hard as any medical student and your talents are certainly as numerous, but without an MD behind your name, I don't buy it. I know you have to be near the top of your dental school class to get an OMFS fellowship, I also know you have to be at the top of your medical school class to get into plastics and of the fish that fill these two ponds, the bigger fish go to medical school.
mcindoe said:Agree with above. To River13, with your logic, why not just let PAs or nurse practitioners do cosmetic procedures too? Do you think experience is simply a matter of who's seen any particular procedure more times than the other?
What people fail to realize is that six years of training isn't just about mastering a technique or procedure. It's about learning how to take care of your patients, before they ever get to the OR and long after they've left. I'm sure there are some cosmetic procedures that a medical student could do alone...but what happens when there's a complication? That's when our beepers go off. A lot of these "cosmetic" surgeons don't know jack about managing their patients when complications arise. I've heard more than enough stories about patients dying during office lipo cases because the dermatologist performing the procedure wasn't surgically trained....they perf the abdomen, they get septic, the cosmetic surgeon doesn't have the experience to be able to recognize what's going on...the patient dies.
I'm not making this stuff up. All I have to say is...caveat emptor.
River13 said:What you fail to realize is we also do 6-7 year long residencies, with available cosmetic fellowships to follow those, and manage as many complications as any other service, including the screw-ups made by other services.
Similiarly to your story, I've heard more than enough stories of PRS's bagging facial nerves when they attempt facelifts because even though they've seen few and done less, they have the PRS title. I would rather send my mother to a surgeon who has done (not seen) and managed plenty of the procedures in the correct way during his/her residency.
No one in my residency just "sees" procedures done...we do them, correctly and skillfully, and manage all perioperative issues, on all types of patients, young and old, healthy and unhealthy...actually most seem unhealthy when they come to us.
Your comments reflect your lack of knowledge about our training.
jdubya said:What do you call a doctor who couldn't get into medical school?
A dentist
toofache32 said:I had to work way harder in dental school than in medical school to get the same grades. The majority of OMFSs agree.
Oh, I'm sorry I didn't realize how hard it is to be a plastic surgeon. Gosh, when you put it like that I can really see how hard you've had to work. Man, I thought I worked hard to be 25, have a DDS, be an oral surgery resident, and be done with the third year of medical school. Surely I must bow to your superiority. BTW, why did you "work your butt off" in high school? It was so easy for me I left in two years. Just me though.jdubya said:Maybe it's not just about the money. Maybe it's about how hard it is to get into medical school and how less so it is to get into dental school. Maybe its about some of us have worked our butts off through high school, undergrad, four years of medical school and 6 or 8 years of residency for the privelege of these procedures and others have taken the shorter and easier route. I've got nothing against dentists, but I've got nothing against scrub techs either...blah, blah, blah
What? Who is this "our"? You signature says you'll have an MD in 2006. Seems to me you are not a PRS nor have you even matched into that program. Dellusions of grandure if you ask me. Symptom of schizophrenia...Ergo said:Our academic program is light on cosmetics...
River13 said:And as asked previously, why don't people-like the above poster-talk about face trauma and how it's done by "dentists"?
Not to quibble, but this is also true for OMFS.Celiac Plexus said:...i'm sure you know that craniofacial surgery is a component of prs training, and a number of prs trained surgeons focus their practices on this type of surgery...
I would agree with this. But I know some ENT programs get a really good exposure to facial plastics, and I'm not sure a fellowship would be entirely necessary other than for credentials. Same for OMFS.TheThroat said:Oto's who get a year of credible Facial Plastic and Reconstructive fellowship training are at least as or more qualified to perform facial plastic procedures than "normal" plastic surgeons. The question is: is the fellowship credible? Unless you are a facial plastic surgeon, its hard to know.
I am currently working with a FPS in Des Moines who is incredibly successful and well-known in the area. Of course, he knows his boundaries (nothing below the neck). That is really where people get in trouble. I have no problem with OMFS doing surgeries if they are well-trained to do them. But just like a general oto doing face lifts, they shouldn't be doing them without fellowship training.
tx oms said:What? Who is this "our"? You signature says you'll have an MD in 2006. Seems to me you are not a PRS nor have you even matched into that program. Dellusions of grandure if you ask me. Symptom of schizophrenia...
tx oms said:What? Who is this "our"? You signature says you'll have an MD in 2006. Seems to me you are not a PRS nor have you even matched into that program. Dellusions of grandure if you ask me. Symptom of schizophrenia...