Crack DAT MATH--Recommend???

[imju85]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

Dear future-dentists, 😀

I've read some threads regarding CD math but I couldn't help but post another thread about it.
I've went over Destroyer Math and Kaplan math, which I thought pretty doable but when I tried to do CD Math, I was like "wooo...."😱 😕

There are some problems I haven't even seen from destroyer or kaplan and I was wondering, is it worth to spend time on trying to learn new types of math problem when I'm 7 days away from scheduled DAT date?

any feedback from people who has already tried CD math or people who have already taken DAT will be very helpful.

ALSO, what do you guys think about CD Science? give a try or no?

Thank you guys in advance!

We are in this together! go US! (and congrat on people who already took their DATs 🙂

 

[pauly11235]

hey, i htink that the Math destroyer is the best method for the math section. It has many amazing problems. CRack DAT MATH is overall not that great and the only thing actually good about CRACK DAT is their PAT materials. I have CRACK MATH And its unrealistically hard. Also, it is not worth it for me. Sinc eyou are so close to your exam just try to do everything in CRACK.

 

[Colorful Joe]

I got the math destroyer, it has been very helpful up until this point.

 

[razblo]

I only plan on studying math from DAT Destroyer. Is that going to be enough?

 

[dentist95757]

i found that crack dat math was very similar to the real thing, I took 6 tests, ranged from 19-24, and i got a 22 on the real thing, so I feel that the difficulty was a little harder, but overall pretty close to the real dat

crack the science was super random, terribly difficult and not very relevant, so I do not recommend it

I would just do practice, and memorize some formulas for the QR, like geometry tricks and trig identities (sin^2x+cos^2x=1, etc)

pm me if you have any questions

 

[Philippines03j]

hey, i htink that the Math destroyer is the best method for the math section. It has many amazing problems. CRack DAT MATH is overall not that great and the only thing actually good about CRACK DAT is their PAT materials. I have CRACK MATH And its unrealistically hard. Also, it is not worth it for me. Sinc eyou are so close to your exam just try to do everything in CRACK.

I have a few questions:

1. Have you taken the dat and if you wouldnt mind sharing your QR score?
2. What was more difficult about Crack DAT math compared to the real dat?
3. When I took some of the practice exams I was scoring between 19-21. Obviously translating this score to what I should get on the real thing is not realistic but would you say that it would stay within a range of +1,-1?

Thanks...

Looks like dentist95's post mentioned a little bit of what I was looking for.