I've heard that it is one of the most realistic dat practice materials for the pat.. i just recently purchased it and must admit I really like it so far
In kaplan i was getting 100% on angle ranking on subject test while with CRACK DAT PAT it was my worst sub section.
One complaint about it though was that some of the tests were easy and some were really hard so on practice tests my score varied from an 18 to a 23. My actual PAT score was a 18
i cant say if it is / isnt like the REAL DAT b/c i havent taken it yet...i can say that it is a far better practice source than anything else out there. That said, it does contain its fair share of errors. And it does have some quirks such as half-holes and some cube-counting that can appear as optical illusions...neither of which (apparently) are on the the real thing
Some of the illusion ones... doesn't it appear that there are actually missing lines on some of them? even in the explanations, it looks like there are lines missing ? are these errors, or is it just me?
Some of the illusion ones... doesn't it appear that there are actually missing lines on some of them? even in the explanations, it looks like there are lines missing ? are these errors, or is it just me?