Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Is there a concept behind determining whether or not we should use PCR or culture in determining the cause of the disease?
I understand that obviously if the organism or pathogen is not culturable then it would not be useful, but I was wondering if there are other important reasons behind using PCR rather than cultures to confirm the diagnosis.
Thanks!
I understand that obviously if the organism or pathogen is not culturable then it would not be useful, but I was wondering if there are other important reasons behind using PCR rather than cultures to confirm the diagnosis.
Thanks!