- Joined
- Aug 26, 2014
- Messages
- 35
- Reaction score
- 6
I wont post the question to respect copyright of dr romano, but someone posted the answerkey here "http://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/dat-destroyer-question.1185974/"
But when finding kb, (when given Ka) the solution says to use kw = KaKb, then solve for Kb. Since we are finding Kb, which is essentially the "reverse of Ka2", why could i have not just taken the inverse of Ka2 to find Kb2 since K forward and K reverse are inversely related
Thank you for your time
But when finding kb, (when given Ka) the solution says to use kw = KaKb, then solve for Kb. Since we are finding Kb, which is essentially the "reverse of Ka2", why could i have not just taken the inverse of Ka2 to find Kb2 since K forward and K reverse are inversely related
Thank you for your time