DAT Destroyer compared to real DAT

Started by Reid Fawcett
DATBooster | The Ultimate DAT Resource
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Browse articles Compare schools My application plan Read Interview Feedback
Practice for interviews Ask an Advisor
R

Reid Fawcett

New Member
5+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I've been taking practice tests using the Destroyer and grading myself based off the old 2009 DAT grading scale and I'm averaging around a 17-19. I also have taken numerous Crack the DAT practice tests where I average around a 20. I was wondering how this would correlate to a grade on the real DAT?
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
I used both DAT destroyer and Crack the DAT to study for the Canadian DAT. Destroyer is more difficult than the actual DAT. For Destroyer, I would recommend that you take your time on each question and really understand why you got each question right or wrong. I used Crack the DAT for RC and PAT. It was a pretty good indicator for those sections. I'd avoid Crack the DAT for practice science tests. I'd recommend DAT Bootcamp for practice. Bootcamp had great tests for all sections, although the PAT and RC were tougher than the real DAT.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.