DAT Destroyer- G-chem #123

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

toothteethtooth

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
70
Reaction score
76

Members don't see this ad.
In this problem, they have done an ICE table for the Kp Problem. I understand that Kp is to be calculated the same way as other K constants such as Ksp and etc. However, in the solutions, they did an ICE table to solve for the Kp They have not canceled out the "X" amount from A or B (both reactants) as it was always considered negligible when I did the Ksp Problems. Chad's videos also shows that X is really low compared to the given concentrations so you cross it out and solve for the rest. In Destroyer, the negligible X amount in the calculation is kept in the answer until the end and solved for. This is a little different than doing calculations for the Ksp ICE table. Can anyone explain me the difference on why X was not considered negligible in this?

I hope I make sense, if not I apologize. DAT in 15 days so I am kind of going crazy!!!!
 

Pearl E. White

D3 at LECOM
7+ Year Member
Joined
May 20, 2014
Messages
1,105
Reaction score
996
In this problem, they have done an ICE table for the Kp Problem. I understand that Kp is to be calculated the same way as other K constants such as Ksp and etc. However, in the solutions, they did an ICE table to solve for the Kp They have not canceled out the "X" amount from A or B (both reactants) as it was always considered negligible when I did the Ksp Problems. Chad's videos also shows that X is really low compared to the given concentrations so you cross it out and solve for the rest. In Destroyer, the negligible X amount in the calculation is kept in the answer until the end and solved for. This is a little different than doing calculations for the Ksp ICE table. Can anyone explain me the difference on why X was not considered negligible in this?

I hope I make sense, if not I apologize. DAT in 15 days so I am kind of going crazy!!!!
What version of Destroyer is this? I have 2017 and my 123 is a cell potential question. Let me know and I will try to help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

DAT Destroyer

Dr. Romano and Nancy
Lifetime Donor
Sponsor
Vendor
15+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
4,697
Reaction score
3,431
In this problem, they have done an ICE table for the Kp Problem. I understand that Kp is to be calculated the same way as other K constants such as Ksp and etc. However, in the solutions, they did an ICE table to solve for the Kp They have not canceled out the "X" amount from A or B (both reactants) as it was always considered negligible when I did the Ksp Problems. Chad's videos also shows that X is really low compared to the given concentrations so you cross it out and solve for the rest. In Destroyer, the negligible X amount in the calculation is kept in the answer until the end and solved for. This is a little different than doing calculations for the Ksp ICE table. Can anyone explain me the difference on why X was not considered negligible in this?

I hope I make sense, if not I apologize. DAT in 15 days so I am kind of going crazy!!!!

When you are solving an acid base problem that involves a Ka or Kb......even a Ksp problem, we will always neglect the x in the denominator. We do this because we are assuming that only a small amount has dissociated or ionized. Without this assumption, a quadratic would be needed. The DAT exam will have calculations in which the approximation holds nicely. I have written up two questions using the ICE table....where you have INITIAL amounts of reactants in an equilibrium expression. The numbers are easy to work with, and although not likely to appear on the exam, it is good practice.

Hope this helps.

Dr. Romano
 
Top