DAT destroyer OChem #77 (2011 version)

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

DentistDMD

Membership Revoked
Removed
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 16, 2011
Messages
198
Reaction score
2
Points
4,571
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Shouldn't there be a double bond between a tertiary carbon and a secondary carbon, not between a tertiary and primary carbons after the bromine leaves?
 
Tert-but Oxide will eliminate to give the Hoffman product or the less substituted alkene - the primary-tertiary in this case as opposed to the secondary-tertiary.
 
Shouldn't there be a double bond between a tertiary carbon and a secondary carbon, not between a tertiary and primary carbons after the bromine leaves?

You know the tert-butoxide ion in tert-butanol is a very BULKY BASE. Bulky base , which that causes to remove H from less stericically available space, which is the methyl group. Think about it, would a bulky base able to approach close enough to remove the H+ from secondary carbon? Probably not, so that causes to do an Anti-Zaitsev elimination. Hope that is clear enough..
 
Top Bottom