DAT destroyer OChem #77 (2011 version)

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

DentistDMD

Membership Revoked
Removed
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Shouldn't there be a double bond between a tertiary carbon and a secondary carbon, not between a tertiary and primary carbons after the bromine leaves?
 
Tert-but Oxide will eliminate to give the Hoffman product or the less substituted alkene - the primary-tertiary in this case as opposed to the secondary-tertiary.
 
Shouldn't there be a double bond between a tertiary carbon and a secondary carbon, not between a tertiary and primary carbons after the bromine leaves?

You know the tert-butoxide ion in tert-butanol is a very BULKY BASE. Bulky base , which that causes to remove H from less stericically available space, which is the methyl group. Think about it, would a bulky base able to approach close enough to remove the H+ from secondary carbon? Probably not, so that causes to do an Anti-Zaitsev elimination. Hope that is clear enough..