- Joined
- Jan 7, 2011
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction score
- 1
Never thought I would see the day, but DAT is finally complete. After this beast of an exam, here's the verdict...
PAT: obviously CDP all the way, not sure how you could do it any other way. Was averaging 23-25 towards the last few I took on CDP, thought real deal was pretty similar. Keyholes easy, TFE a few tricky ones nothing too out of the ordinary, I swear a few of those angles were the exact same but that might be some of the effects after 90 minutes of science, cubes and hole punching easier than CDP, and pattern folding about the same.
QR: What I thought would be my strongest section coming into the test, took 10 math destroyers and was getting 22-25 towards the end. However on the real test I was so surprised how quickly I ran out of time, literally blind guessing on probably 5 questions. Not sure how this happened considering I had my timing pretty well down on the math destroyer, probably just worn out from the rest of the sections. Overall on par with math destroyer, timing a much bigger obstacle than the actual questions.
RC: Now this section took the most utmost focus and concentration of all. I thought my eyes were literally going to explode after focusing on that screen for so long. Averaged 20 on cdr, thought the real test was much more search and destroy type questions compared to cdr, which wasn't really how I prepared. cdr still good practice though. Didn't get pianoed, and last passage seemed really easy for some reason, go figure. Luckily I had about five minutes left at the end to literally just rest my eyes before the math section. I honestly think I would've been screwed on math if I didn't have enough time to rest my eyes a few minutes. Gotta love computer based tests...
BS: Oh DAT biology...all I can do is shake my head at you. I'd like to think I've read through a great deal of biology in my college career and there were literally things I've never heard of before. This section is by far the biggest toss-up, just glad I somehow "survived". How people destroy this section is absolutely beyond me, but I guess it's not the end of the world. Just tried to forget about it and maintain confidence for the rest of the test, obviously easier said than done.
GC: I would say this was my weakest subject throughout preparing for the test, just never quite "clicked" with me. Went through Chad, not sure if I would praise him quite as much as others on this forum do, but I would say it was a "good start". The real moneymaker on both chems is destroyer, definitely just need practice questions to do after Chad.
OC: Always thought I had a decent grasp on ochem, this section seemed to have a few tough questions. Destroyer's good for this too, but only got a few reaction questions. Don't even remember what the rest were like, some just seemed really insignificant concepts, but oh well.
Was hoping for 20+, so I'm decently satisfied with these scores. Big thanks to SDN for all the advice, I don't even wanna know how some people do this test without this website.
PAT: obviously CDP all the way, not sure how you could do it any other way. Was averaging 23-25 towards the last few I took on CDP, thought real deal was pretty similar. Keyholes easy, TFE a few tricky ones nothing too out of the ordinary, I swear a few of those angles were the exact same but that might be some of the effects after 90 minutes of science, cubes and hole punching easier than CDP, and pattern folding about the same.
QR: What I thought would be my strongest section coming into the test, took 10 math destroyers and was getting 22-25 towards the end. However on the real test I was so surprised how quickly I ran out of time, literally blind guessing on probably 5 questions. Not sure how this happened considering I had my timing pretty well down on the math destroyer, probably just worn out from the rest of the sections. Overall on par with math destroyer, timing a much bigger obstacle than the actual questions.
RC: Now this section took the most utmost focus and concentration of all. I thought my eyes were literally going to explode after focusing on that screen for so long. Averaged 20 on cdr, thought the real test was much more search and destroy type questions compared to cdr, which wasn't really how I prepared. cdr still good practice though. Didn't get pianoed, and last passage seemed really easy for some reason, go figure. Luckily I had about five minutes left at the end to literally just rest my eyes before the math section. I honestly think I would've been screwed on math if I didn't have enough time to rest my eyes a few minutes. Gotta love computer based tests...
BS: Oh DAT biology...all I can do is shake my head at you. I'd like to think I've read through a great deal of biology in my college career and there were literally things I've never heard of before. This section is by far the biggest toss-up, just glad I somehow "survived". How people destroy this section is absolutely beyond me, but I guess it's not the end of the world. Just tried to forget about it and maintain confidence for the rest of the test, obviously easier said than done.
GC: I would say this was my weakest subject throughout preparing for the test, just never quite "clicked" with me. Went through Chad, not sure if I would praise him quite as much as others on this forum do, but I would say it was a "good start". The real moneymaker on both chems is destroyer, definitely just need practice questions to do after Chad.
OC: Always thought I had a decent grasp on ochem, this section seemed to have a few tough questions. Destroyer's good for this too, but only got a few reaction questions. Don't even remember what the rest were like, some just seemed really insignificant concepts, but oh well.
Was hoping for 20+, so I'm decently satisfied with these scores. Big thanks to SDN for all the advice, I don't even wanna know how some people do this test without this website.
Last edited: