So, I know it's late, but here are my scores. They seem a lot more normal than what I've seen on here.
PAT-21
QR-21
RC-22
BIO-18
GC-22
OC-20
TS-20
AA-21
Biology--
I am a bio major. I've had several upper level classes. I read Campbell's extensively, including the 18-21 chapters. I read AP Bio 3-4 times. I just felt like that was the most ridiculous set of questions I could have been asked. I remembered a few of them and I could not even find the answers in Campbell's afterward. I'm posting this because I'm very worried about my Bio score. I know I could not have been any more prepared. I just feel like I can't even convey how unfair and stupid the questions were, did anyone else have this experience????
Chemistry--
I used DAT Destroyer for these sections. I did all the questions 3 times. It didn't help. The questions I received were not close to what I got on the test, which is stupid because that book covers every topic.
PAT and QR were much easier than what I practiced with CRACK tests.
Overall, the test was as bad as I thought it would be I feel like I could have done a week of preparation (rather than almost 2 months) and gotten the same scores. The questions I got in the science portions were so obscure, the test was a joke. I guess that's just the reality of the application process, you just have to do it. It really just tests your ability to focus on something and handle the stress, rather than actual knowledge.
Here are my GPAs:
BCP-3.9
Science-3.8
Non-science-4.0
Total-3.9
I'm applying to UW, OHSU, UCSF, BU, UMDNJ, UPENN, Temple, UMICH
What are my chances? Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!
PAT-21
QR-21
RC-22
BIO-18
GC-22
OC-20
TS-20
AA-21
Biology--
I am a bio major. I've had several upper level classes. I read Campbell's extensively, including the 18-21 chapters. I read AP Bio 3-4 times. I just felt like that was the most ridiculous set of questions I could have been asked. I remembered a few of them and I could not even find the answers in Campbell's afterward. I'm posting this because I'm very worried about my Bio score. I know I could not have been any more prepared. I just feel like I can't even convey how unfair and stupid the questions were, did anyone else have this experience????
Chemistry--
I used DAT Destroyer for these sections. I did all the questions 3 times. It didn't help. The questions I received were not close to what I got on the test, which is stupid because that book covers every topic.
PAT and QR were much easier than what I practiced with CRACK tests.
Overall, the test was as bad as I thought it would be I feel like I could have done a week of preparation (rather than almost 2 months) and gotten the same scores. The questions I got in the science portions were so obscure, the test was a joke. I guess that's just the reality of the application process, you just have to do it. It really just tests your ability to focus on something and handle the stress, rather than actual knowledge.
Here are my GPAs:
BCP-3.9
Science-3.8
Non-science-4.0
Total-3.9
I'm applying to UW, OHSU, UCSF, BU, UMDNJ, UPENN, Temple, UMICH
What are my chances? Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!