- Joined
- Jan 8, 2013
- Messages
- 315
- Reaction score
- 49
I don't understand how the formal charge is 0. I got +2. According to the formula which CHAD provides it comes out to be +2. But destroyer gives, not only a different answer but uses another formula to calculate.
If destroyer has not made a mistake then should I use their technique or stick to CHAD's.
Since the attachment thing won't work I'll just type the question.
What is the formal charge on Xe in XeF2?
Xe-8
2F-14
total= 22e-
so according to CHAD there are 8 valence electrons in Xe normally and 6 valence in the lewis structure
therefore, according to CHAD
normal valence electrons - actual valence electrons= formal charge
8 - 6 = +2
That is what I did.
Please help
If destroyer has not made a mistake then should I use their technique or stick to CHAD's.
Since the attachment thing won't work I'll just type the question.
What is the formal charge on Xe in XeF2?
Xe-8
2F-14
total= 22e-
so according to CHAD there are 8 valence electrons in Xe normally and 6 valence in the lewis structure
therefore, according to CHAD
normal valence electrons - actual valence electrons= formal charge
8 - 6 = +2
That is what I did.
Please help