

My scores for the DAT weren't that great but are they good enough to get in somewhere?
AA 19 PAT 19 QR 18 RC 21 BI 21 GC 18 OC 18 TS 19
ECs...a LOT. I'm very involved in community service, president of three clubs and captain of the soccer team at my university.
GPA is a 3.9...but I go to a smaller school, D3 so I'm worried they'll assume my courses are not as tough.
A 3.9 is a killer GPA, no matter what division school you go to. I think with that GPA your DAT is high enoughDon't assume since you are at a D3 that the admissions people will think your classes are easier---they know better, even if the general public does not. Your stats and EC's are great. I'm assuming you have 100+ shadow hours. Are you applying this cycle though? It's kind of late now to get in for first round interviews. I'd probably save the money and apply next cycle.
Actually, some schools factor difficulty/prestige of an undergrad into admissions process by dividing undergrads into tiers and use that info as a multiplier for GPA portion. Ex) a tier-1 school applicant might get 4.0 (GPA) x 1 (tier adjusted multiplier) = 4.0, whereas a tier-2 applicant might get 4.0 x 0.9 = 3.6 etc.Don't assume since you are at a D3 that the admissions people will think your classes are easier
Actually, some schools factor difficulty/prestige of an undergrad into admissions process by dividing undergrads into tiers and use that info as a multiplier for GPA portion. Ex) a tier-1 school applicant might get 4.0 (GPA) x 1 (tier adjusted multiplier) = 4.0, whereas a tier-2 applicant might get 4.0 x 0.9 = 3.6 etc.
Actually, some schools factor difficulty/prestige of an undergrad into admissions process by dividing undergrads into tiers and use that info as a multiplier for GPA portion. Ex) a tier-1 school applicant might get 4.0 (GPA) x 1 (tier adjusted multiplier) = 4.0, whereas a tier-2 applicant might get 4.0 x 0.9 = 3.6 etc.
I've never heard of this.Actually, some schools factor difficulty/prestige of an undergrad into admissions process by dividing undergrads into tiers and use that info as a multiplier for GPA portion. Ex) a tier-1 school applicant might get 4.0 (GPA) x 1 (tier adjusted multiplier) = 4.0, whereas a tier-2 applicant might get 4.0 x 0.9 = 3.6 etc.
I think they may do this when comparing Colleges and Universities to Community College but I don't know how you could possibly do that when comparing Universities and Colleges to each other. Take for example I go to a D3 and our Biochemistry class is known to be much more rigorous than the U of MN (just down the road) so many students elect to take it there for the easy A. But that's just department by department for all I know our O-Chem may be easier (I doubt it our O-chem is very very difficult). Professors play a huge role in grades and that varies by class to class. I just don't see how you can group a school into a tier based on a few classes. Also what is their criteria for tier ranking?You get this information from whom? You do realize that some of the most "prestigious" universities are also the most notorious for grade inflation, right? Does that mean they downgrade their GPA's then? How exactly are these so called tiers divided? You do realize that Division 3 that we are talking about is just an athletic designation, schools like M.I.T. are Division 3, does that mean it's less "prestigious"?
So you would rate a 3.5 from MIT the same as a 3.5 from DeVry? For Marquette, the ADEA Official Guide to Dental Schools book specifically states it considers "quality of undergraduate institute attended" as an admission factor.You get this information from whom? You do realize that some of the most "prestigious" universities are also the most notorious for grade inflation, right? Does that mean they downgrade their GPA's then? How exactly are these so called tiers divided? You do realize that Division 3 that we are talking about is just an athletic designation, schools like M.I.T. are Division 3, does that mean it's less "prestigious"?