Hi guys,
So I took the DATs for the first time this past January after having only studied for about a month (poor decision on my part) this was reflected in my first set of scores:
PAT: 18
QR: 16
RC: 21
Bio: 17
GC: 17
OC: 16
TS: 17
AA: 17
Obviously I knew a retake was in order so I bucked up and studied from the end of May until just today when I took it again. My scores are as follows:
PAT: 18
QR: 16 🙁
RC: 20
Bio: 21
GC: 21
OC: 20
TS: 21
AA: 20
So obviously there was a drastic improvement in my science and total science, as well as my AA...but I can't help but be really upset with my score in QR which I really thought was bound to improve. So my main question for you all is: is this bad QR score bad enough to overshadow my major improvement from a 17-21 in science and 17-20 in AA? Like enough where I would have to sit for a THIRD time??
Any feedback would be appreciated! Thanks!
So I took the DATs for the first time this past January after having only studied for about a month (poor decision on my part) this was reflected in my first set of scores:
PAT: 18
QR: 16
RC: 21
Bio: 17
GC: 17
OC: 16
TS: 17
AA: 17
Obviously I knew a retake was in order so I bucked up and studied from the end of May until just today when I took it again. My scores are as follows:
PAT: 18
QR: 16 🙁
RC: 20
Bio: 21
GC: 21
OC: 20
TS: 21
AA: 20
So obviously there was a drastic improvement in my science and total science, as well as my AA...but I can't help but be really upset with my score in QR which I really thought was bound to improve. So my main question for you all is: is this bad QR score bad enough to overshadow my major improvement from a 17-21 in science and 17-20 in AA? Like enough where I would have to sit for a THIRD time??
Any feedback would be appreciated! Thanks!
Last edited: