Last edited:
Valid points, but UCSD is still a solid and very underrated school. The difference between the schools is fairly negligible (rank 19 vs. 20), even w/ a similar COA. So I'd go with UCSD. The cost difference is def not worth it, and I don't see UCLA providing any significant extra opportunities over UCSD.People may disagree with me, but I feel that UCLA > UCSD. P/F is a MASSIVE stress reducer and basically saves you so much unnecessary stress.
I think this is a fair point if you're comparing UCLA to a mid-tier or low-tier option. UCSD, however, is an outstanding medical school and exceptionally well-respected on the west coast. And if not super well-known nationally, it will be eventually as the entire university has grown in stature tremendously in recent years.The scholarship is huge- congrats!! I wouldn't take that option lightly, but at the end of the day I think its also important to ask yourself how you will feel with your decision once you're an attending and have training and tuition behind you. Will you have more "what ifs" if you go to one program vs another? Feeling confident in your decision will help you get the most out of any choice and program. I recently made a decision to go to the more expensive program because an attending mentor reassured me that I would be able to navigate finances, but I couldn't redo years of my life or eliminate regrets. Again, I wouldn't discount that amazing scholarship, but just wanted to add additional food for thought.